Undergraduates’ Perceptions on Data Visualization Consumption versus Production: It’s Communication, but Is It “Writing”?

Sarah K. Gunning
{"title":"Undergraduates’ Perceptions on Data Visualization Consumption versus Production: It’s Communication, but Is It “Writing”?","authors":"Sarah K. Gunning","doi":"10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is producing data visualizations (charts, graphs, tables) considered to be ’writing’? We know university students are fairly comfortable critiquing data visualizations and are exposed to data visualization interpretations as early as elementary school, but where does the onus of data visualization production fall within university curriculum? This exploratory study describes the results of a pilot test of undergraduate students’ experiences with and confidence of producing data visualization artifacts from raw data. The purpose of the paper is to provide a starting point for collecting information about how confident students feel by the time they reach college to produce graphs based on raw data. Most students were neutral/slightly confident in their current abilities but “hoped/planned to be so by graduation.” 65% of students were somewhat confident or confident in their ability to produce charts. The paper asks where we are teaching these skills, and is the humanities, rather than business, the right place for teaching data visualization production skills? The pilot survey is under review for revision to include additional questions posed by audience members for the conference session, and from members of SIGDOC, PROCOMM, Association of Teachers of Technical Writing (ATTW) and Council of Programs of Technical & Scientific Communication (CPTSC). The presentation will serve as a sounding board for when and where we teach the production of data visualization in our curriculums.","PeriodicalId":286504,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is producing data visualizations (charts, graphs, tables) considered to be ’writing’? We know university students are fairly comfortable critiquing data visualizations and are exposed to data visualization interpretations as early as elementary school, but where does the onus of data visualization production fall within university curriculum? This exploratory study describes the results of a pilot test of undergraduate students’ experiences with and confidence of producing data visualization artifacts from raw data. The purpose of the paper is to provide a starting point for collecting information about how confident students feel by the time they reach college to produce graphs based on raw data. Most students were neutral/slightly confident in their current abilities but “hoped/planned to be so by graduation.” 65% of students were somewhat confident or confident in their ability to produce charts. The paper asks where we are teaching these skills, and is the humanities, rather than business, the right place for teaching data visualization production skills? The pilot survey is under review for revision to include additional questions posed by audience members for the conference session, and from members of SIGDOC, PROCOMM, Association of Teachers of Technical Writing (ATTW) and Council of Programs of Technical & Scientific Communication (CPTSC). The presentation will serve as a sounding board for when and where we teach the production of data visualization in our curriculums.
大学生对数据可视化消费与生产的认知:是沟通,还是“写作”?
制作数据可视化(图表、图形、表格)被认为是“写作”吗?我们知道,大学生对数据可视化的批评相当自如,并且早在小学就接触过数据可视化的解释,但是数据可视化生产的责任在大学课程中落在哪里?这项探索性研究描述了本科生从原始数据中产生数据可视化工件的经验和信心的试点测试的结果。本文的目的是提供一个起点,收集有关学生在进入大学时的自信程度的信息,并根据原始数据制作图表。大多数学生对自己目前的能力没有信心,但“希望/计划在毕业时达到这样的水平”。“65%的学生对自己制作图表的能力有一定的信心或信心。这篇论文提出了这样的问题:我们在哪里教授这些技能?教授数据可视化生产技能的正确地点是人文学科,而不是商业学科吗?试点调查正在审查修改中,以包括会议听众成员以及SIGDOC、PROCOMM、技术写作教师协会(ATTW)和技术与科学传播计划委员会(CPTSC)成员提出的其他问题。该演示将作为我们在课程中讲授数据可视化生产的时间和地点的宣传板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信