What was Molyneux’s question a question about?

Jonathan D. Cohen, M. Matthen
{"title":"What was Molyneux’s question a question about?","authors":"Jonathan D. Cohen, M. Matthen","doi":"10.4324/9780429020377-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): COHEN, Jonathan; Matthen, Mohan | Editor(s): Ferretti, Gabriele; Glenney, Brian | Abstract: Molyneux asked whether a newly sighted person could distinguish a sphere from a cube by sight alone, given that she was antecedently able to do so by touch. This, we contend, is a question about general ideas. To answer it, we must ask (a) whether spatial locations identified by touch can be identified also by sight, and (b) whether the integration of spatial locations into an idea of shape persists through changes of modality. Posed this way, Molyneux’s Question goes substantially beyond question (a), about spatial locations, alone; for a positive answer to (a) leaves open whether a perceiver might cross-identify locations, but not be able to identify the shapes that collections of locations comprise. We further emphasize that MQ targets general ideas so as to distinguish it from corresponding questions about experiences of shape and about the property of tangible (vs. visual) shape. After proposing a generalized formulation of MQ, we extend earlier work (“Many Molyneux Questions,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 2020) by showing that MQ does not admit a single answer across the board. Some integrative data-processes transfer across modalities; others do not. Seeing where and how such transfer succeeds and fails in individual cases has much to offer to our understanding of perception and its modalities.","PeriodicalId":364714,"journal":{"name":"Molyneux’s Question and the History of Philosophy","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molyneux’s Question and the History of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020377-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Author(s): COHEN, Jonathan; Matthen, Mohan | Editor(s): Ferretti, Gabriele; Glenney, Brian | Abstract: Molyneux asked whether a newly sighted person could distinguish a sphere from a cube by sight alone, given that she was antecedently able to do so by touch. This, we contend, is a question about general ideas. To answer it, we must ask (a) whether spatial locations identified by touch can be identified also by sight, and (b) whether the integration of spatial locations into an idea of shape persists through changes of modality. Posed this way, Molyneux’s Question goes substantially beyond question (a), about spatial locations, alone; for a positive answer to (a) leaves open whether a perceiver might cross-identify locations, but not be able to identify the shapes that collections of locations comprise. We further emphasize that MQ targets general ideas so as to distinguish it from corresponding questions about experiences of shape and about the property of tangible (vs. visual) shape. After proposing a generalized formulation of MQ, we extend earlier work (“Many Molyneux Questions,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 2020) by showing that MQ does not admit a single answer across the board. Some integrative data-processes transfer across modalities; others do not. Seeing where and how such transfer succeeds and fails in individual cases has much to offer to our understanding of perception and its modalities.
Molyneux的问题到底是关于什么?
作者:COHEN, Jonathan;马腾、莫汉|编辑:费雷蒂、加布里埃莱;Molyneux提出了一个问题:如果一个视力刚刚恢复的人之前能够通过触觉分辨出球体和立方体,那么她是否能够仅凭视觉分辨出球体和立方体。我们认为,这是一个关于一般观念的问题。要回答这个问题,我们必须问:(a)通过触觉识别的空间位置是否也可以通过视觉识别,以及(b)空间位置与形状概念的整合是否通过形态的变化而持续存在。如此看来,Molyneux的问题就远远超出了问题(a),即空间位置;因为对(a)的肯定回答留下了一个开放性,即感知者是否可能交叉识别位置,但无法识别位置集合所包含的形状。我们进一步强调,MQ针对的是一般概念,以便将其与有关形状经验和有形形状(相对于视觉形状)属性的相应问题区分开来。在提出MQ的广义公式后,我们扩展了早期的工作(“许多Molyneux问题”,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 2020),表明MQ不承认一个全面的答案。一些综合数据过程跨模式传输;其他人则不然。在个别情况下,观察这种转移在哪里以及如何成功和失败,对我们理解感知及其模式有很大帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信