Comparative analysis of different fractal methods in studying post-ictal ECG signals of epilepsy patient

M. Chakraborty, T. Das, D. Ghosh
{"title":"Comparative analysis of different fractal methods in studying post-ictal ECG signals of epilepsy patient","authors":"M. Chakraborty, T. Das, D. Ghosh","doi":"10.1109/CMI.2016.7413743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring EEG signals as a diagnostic tool for Epileptic patient is a well traveled way. Different non-linear statistical approaches have been applied over the past years on this signal to reveal the nature of connection between epilepsy and EEG. In this work we study the post-ictal ECG signals of epileptic patient collected from MIT-BIH database using mono-fractal methods as well as multifractal approach. We compare the results of the same statistical methods with healthy normal group. Result from monofractal analysis such as Rescaled range analysis indicates that the ECG signals of epileptic patients are anti-persistent in nature whereas for healthy normal people it is persistent. Detrended fluctuation analysis also confirms the same fact and declares that ECG signals of healthy normal people are more persistent and more correlated than epileptic patients. Finally we use the multifractal approach on the ECG signals. Result from the Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis confirms that healthy normal people have higher degree of multifractality compared to epileptic patients.","PeriodicalId":244262,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE First International Conference on Control, Measurement and Instrumentation (CMI)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE First International Conference on Control, Measurement and Instrumentation (CMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMI.2016.7413743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Measuring EEG signals as a diagnostic tool for Epileptic patient is a well traveled way. Different non-linear statistical approaches have been applied over the past years on this signal to reveal the nature of connection between epilepsy and EEG. In this work we study the post-ictal ECG signals of epileptic patient collected from MIT-BIH database using mono-fractal methods as well as multifractal approach. We compare the results of the same statistical methods with healthy normal group. Result from monofractal analysis such as Rescaled range analysis indicates that the ECG signals of epileptic patients are anti-persistent in nature whereas for healthy normal people it is persistent. Detrended fluctuation analysis also confirms the same fact and declares that ECG signals of healthy normal people are more persistent and more correlated than epileptic patients. Finally we use the multifractal approach on the ECG signals. Result from the Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis confirms that healthy normal people have higher degree of multifractality compared to epileptic patients.
不同分形方法在癫痫发作后心电信号研究中的比较分析
脑电信号测量作为癫痫患者的诊断手段是一种较为成熟的方法。在过去的几年里,不同的非线性统计方法被应用于这一信号,以揭示癫痫与脑电图之间联系的本质。本文采用单分形方法和多重分形方法研究了从MIT-BIH数据库中收集的癫痫患者的心电信号。我们将相同统计方法的结果与健康正常组进行比较。单分形分析(如重标度极差分析)结果表明,癫痫患者的心电信号具有抗持续性,而健康正常人的心电信号具有持续性。趋势波动分析也证实了这一事实,表明健康正常人的心电信号比癫痫患者更持久,相关性更强。最后对心电信号进行多重分形分析。多重分形趋势波动分析结果证实,健康正常人的多重分形程度高于癫痫患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信