In search of heart barometer—advantage of left atrial dimension over electrocardiographic indices of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension

Bogusława Nowak, R. Nowakowski, Aleksandra Gapys, T. Rechciński, E. Trzos, M. Kurpesa, P. Lipiec, J. Kasprzak, Karina Wierzbowska-Drabik
{"title":"In search of heart barometer—advantage of left atrial dimension over electrocardiographic indices of left ventricular hypertrophy in arterial hypertension","authors":"Bogusława Nowak, R. Nowakowski, Aleksandra Gapys, T. Rechciński, E. Trzos, M. Kurpesa, P. Lipiec, J. Kasprzak, Karina Wierzbowska-Drabik","doi":"10.37349/ec.2023.00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) is a common and relevant complication of arterial hypertension (AH) and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is widely used for its preliminary assessment. The aim of the study was to compare the correlations of four ECG-derived criteria of LVH and left atrial (LA) anteroposterior diameter with LVH assessed by echocardiography and expressed as left ventricular mass (LVM) index (LVMI) in search of the most accurate preliminary indicator of LVH.\nMethods: The study included 61 subjects with AH [age (year) 69 ± 10, 17 females] and 27 without AH, (age 40 ± 9, 10 females) evaluated with 12-lead ECG and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). As the ECG-based criteria of LVH Sokolow-Lyon index (SLI), Cornell voltage (CV), Cornell product (CP), and Romhilt-Estes point score (RES) system were evaluated. The ECG indices and LA diameter were correlated with LVMI and correlations coefficients were compared.\nResults: Among ECG-LVH indicators SLI showed the closest correlation with LVMI [rank correlation coefficients (rho) = 0.38, P < 0.0001], followed by CV and CP with rho = 0.33, P = 0.002 and rho = 0.32, P = 0.002, respectively, whereas RES did not correlate significantly with LVMI. The strongest correlation with LVMI was found for the LA diameter with rho = 0.73 and P < 0.0001, showing an even stronger correlation in women—rho = 0.8 (P < 0.0001) vs. rho = 0.65 (P < 0.0001) in men. In the multivariate analysis, the LA was the only independent predictor of the increased LVMI with R2 = 0.52, P < 0.0001.\nConclusions: LA diameter outperformed significantly the ECG indices as far as the correlation with LVMI was concerned and emerged as the only independent predictor of mild and moderate LVH in hypertensive patients. Among the ECG criteria, the strongest correlation was shown for SLI, followed by CV and CP indices.","PeriodicalId":218206,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of Cardiology","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/ec.2023.00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) is a common and relevant complication of arterial hypertension (AH) and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is widely used for its preliminary assessment. The aim of the study was to compare the correlations of four ECG-derived criteria of LVH and left atrial (LA) anteroposterior diameter with LVH assessed by echocardiography and expressed as left ventricular mass (LVM) index (LVMI) in search of the most accurate preliminary indicator of LVH. Methods: The study included 61 subjects with AH [age (year) 69 ± 10, 17 females] and 27 without AH, (age 40 ± 9, 10 females) evaluated with 12-lead ECG and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). As the ECG-based criteria of LVH Sokolow-Lyon index (SLI), Cornell voltage (CV), Cornell product (CP), and Romhilt-Estes point score (RES) system were evaluated. The ECG indices and LA diameter were correlated with LVMI and correlations coefficients were compared. Results: Among ECG-LVH indicators SLI showed the closest correlation with LVMI [rank correlation coefficients (rho) = 0.38, P < 0.0001], followed by CV and CP with rho = 0.33, P = 0.002 and rho = 0.32, P = 0.002, respectively, whereas RES did not correlate significantly with LVMI. The strongest correlation with LVMI was found for the LA diameter with rho = 0.73 and P < 0.0001, showing an even stronger correlation in women—rho = 0.8 (P < 0.0001) vs. rho = 0.65 (P < 0.0001) in men. In the multivariate analysis, the LA was the only independent predictor of the increased LVMI with R2 = 0.52, P < 0.0001. Conclusions: LA diameter outperformed significantly the ECG indices as far as the correlation with LVMI was concerned and emerged as the only independent predictor of mild and moderate LVH in hypertensive patients. Among the ECG criteria, the strongest correlation was shown for SLI, followed by CV and CP indices.
寻找心脏晴雨表-左房维数相对于高血压左室肥厚心电图指标的优势
目的:左室肥厚(LVH)是动脉性高血压(AH)的常见并发症,12导联心电图(ECG)被广泛用于其初步评估。本研究的目的是比较左室质量(LVM)指数(LVMI)与超声心动图评估的左室质量(LVM)指数(LVMI)的相关性,以寻找最准确的LVH初步指标。方法:采用12导联心电图和经胸超声心动图(TTE)对61例AH患者(年龄(年龄)69±10,女性17例)和27例非AH患者(年龄(年龄)40±9,女性10例)进行评价。以Sokolow-Lyon指数(SLI)、Cornell voltage (CV)、Cornell product (CP)、Romhilt-Estes point score (RES)系统作为LVH的ecg评价标准。心电指标、左室直径与LVMI相关,并比较相关系数。结果:在ECG-LVH指标中,SLI与LVMI相关性最密切[秩相关系数(rho) = 0.38, P < 0.0001],其次是CV和CP,分别为rho = 0.33, P = 0.002和rho = 0.32, P = 0.002,而RES与LVMI相关性不显著。LA直径与LVMI的相关性最强,rho = 0.73, P < 0.0001,女性的相关性更强,rho = 0.8 (P < 0.0001),男性的rho = 0.65 (P < 0.0001)。在多因素分析中,LA是LVMI升高的唯一独立预测因子,R2 = 0.52, P < 0.0001。结论:左室直径与LVMI的相关性优于ECG指标,是高血压患者轻、中度LVH的唯一独立预测指标。在ECG指标中,SLI相关性最强,其次是CV和CP指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信