New aspects concerning the comparison tests between the STL reference current shunt and an ICMET standard shunt, regarded in interference with the issues of the “CMC” concept

G. Curcanu, Alexandru-Marius Ionescu, Ovidiu Mihăiţă, M. Ionescu, Mihaela Iovan, Cerasela Rusu
{"title":"New aspects concerning the comparison tests between the STL reference current shunt and an ICMET standard shunt, regarded in interference with the issues of the “CMC” concept","authors":"G. Curcanu, Alexandru-Marius Ionescu, Ovidiu Mihăiţă, M. Ionescu, Mihaela Iovan, Cerasela Rusu","doi":"10.1109/ICATE.2014.6972623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an overview of the comparison tests on two current shunts performed on March 2012 in ICMET Craiova as well as the consequences of this comparison for the demonstration of the traceability of the calibrations carried out by the ICMET Calibration Laboratory “C.L. - High Currents”, and other issues about the measurement uncertainties. The two current shunts which underwent the comparison program are the STL reference standard shunt for Europe and Africa and the coaxial shunt type 200kA manufactured by IPH Berlin which stands for the C.L. - ICMET standard shunt. Both of the shunts are of the same manufactory type with similar technical characteristics, thus providing the ability of comparison. The comparison results, proving little errors (in comparison with the magnitude order of the CMC having been stated for the C.L. for this kind of tests) related to the scale factor of the IPH-ICMET shunt, are consistent with the results of all its Calibration Certificates, so this is a witness of the traceability of the measurement results in C.L. On the other side, the IPH shunt and the HBM digitizers are the main error component sources of the Current Reference Measuring System belonging to C.L.-ICMET. By two different checking undertakings and by the calibration certificates, we conclude that the errors introduced by the digitizers are also very small. The results here-above showed that the uncertainties associated to the scale factor of the Reference Measuring System are much smaller than the “CMC” having been stated for it under accredited regime.","PeriodicalId":327050,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Electricity (ICATE)","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Electricity (ICATE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATE.2014.6972623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the comparison tests on two current shunts performed on March 2012 in ICMET Craiova as well as the consequences of this comparison for the demonstration of the traceability of the calibrations carried out by the ICMET Calibration Laboratory “C.L. - High Currents”, and other issues about the measurement uncertainties. The two current shunts which underwent the comparison program are the STL reference standard shunt for Europe and Africa and the coaxial shunt type 200kA manufactured by IPH Berlin which stands for the C.L. - ICMET standard shunt. Both of the shunts are of the same manufactory type with similar technical characteristics, thus providing the ability of comparison. The comparison results, proving little errors (in comparison with the magnitude order of the CMC having been stated for the C.L. for this kind of tests) related to the scale factor of the IPH-ICMET shunt, are consistent with the results of all its Calibration Certificates, so this is a witness of the traceability of the measurement results in C.L. On the other side, the IPH shunt and the HBM digitizers are the main error component sources of the Current Reference Measuring System belonging to C.L.-ICMET. By two different checking undertakings and by the calibration certificates, we conclude that the errors introduced by the digitizers are also very small. The results here-above showed that the uncertainties associated to the scale factor of the Reference Measuring System are much smaller than the “CMC” having been stated for it under accredited regime.
STL参考电流分流器与ICMET标准分流器对比试验的新方面,被认为与“CMC”概念的干扰问题有关
本文概述了2012年3月在ICMET克拉约瓦进行的对两个电流分流器的比较测试,以及这种比较对ICMET校准实验室“C.L.”进行校准的可追溯性的演示的后果-大电流”等有关测量不确定度的问题。经过比较程序的两个电流分流器是欧洲和非洲的STL参考标准分流器和由IPH柏林制造的同轴分流器200kA型,代表C.L. - ICMET标准分流器。这两种分流器是同一厂家生产的,具有相似的技术特点,从而提供了比较的能力。比较结果证明,与iphi - icmet分流器的比例因子有关的误差很小(与为C.L.规定的CMC数量级相比),与其所有校准证书的结果一致,因此这是C.L.测量结果可追溯性的证明。IPH分流器和HBM数字化仪是cl - icmet电流参考测量系统的主要误差源。通过两次不同的检查和校准证书,我们得出结论,数字化仪引入的误差也很小。以上的结果显示,与参考测量系统的比例因子有关的不确定度远小于在认可制度下为其规定的“CMC”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信