Tax-Assisted Approaches for Helping Canadians Meet Out-of-Pocket Health-Care Costs

J. Emery
{"title":"Tax-Assisted Approaches for Helping Canadians Meet Out-of-Pocket Health-Care Costs","authors":"J. Emery","doi":"10.11575/SPPP.V9I0.42592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadians are not saving for the inevitable costs of drugs and long-term care which they will have to pay for out of pocket in their old age, and these costs could potentially be financially devastating for them. Later in life, when out-of-pocket health-care costs mount, those who previously enjoyed the security of a workplace insurance plan to cover such expenses will face a grim financial reality. Many aspects of care for older Canadians aren’t covered by this country’s single-payer health-care system. Besides prescription drugs, these include management of chronic conditions by ancillary health professionals, home care, long-term care, and dental and vision care. Statistics show that in 2012, Canadians’ private spending on health care totaled $60 billion, with private health insurance covering $24.5 billion of that amount. Coverage of health-care costs that don’t fall under Medicare’s purview is at present rather piecemeal. The non-refundable federal Medical Expense Tax Credit covers expenses only after the three-per-cent minimum, or first $2,171, of out-of-pocket costs have been paid by the individual. The Disability Tax Credit is available to those with a certified chronic disability, and these individuals are eligible for further support via the Registered Disability Savings Plan. A Caregiver Tax Credit is also available. The federal government has a golden opportunity to provide an incentive for Canadians to set aside money to pay not only for the often catastrophic medical and drug costs that can come with aging, but also to save so they can afford long-term care, or purchase private health insurance. Too many Canadians, unfortunately, believe that the federal government picks up the tab for long-term care. In fact, provincial subsidies are provided on a means-testing basis, thus leaving many better-off Canadians in the lurch when they can no longer live alone and must make the transition to long-term care. Providing more generous tax treatment of current and future out-of-pocket health costs, including insurance premiums, is an obvious way for the federal government to support Canadians to meet their health care needs and improve their well-being. Two existing vehicles can play an essential part of this plan. The government can change the currently non-refundable Medical Expenses Tax Credit and the refundable Medical Expenses Supplement so that out-ofpocket health-care costs are eligible from the first dollar. This would place no added burden on government if the exemption of employer-provided health benefits from employees’ taxable income were removed. Making an altered METC available to Canadians who pay their out-of-pocket costs from a registered health savings vehicle, which could be created within an RRSP to avoid extra administrative burdens, would provide them with an incentive to save. They could then either self-insure for future out-of-pocket health costs, or purchase private health insurance. A grant component could be added for lower-income families to make such savings incentives more widely diffuse. Treating health benefits as taxable income subject to the modified Medical Expenses Tax Credit would address efficiency and equity issues with the existing tax treatments of health-care costs while extending tax assistance for out-of-pocket costs to more of the population. When the onus for decision making about payments and insurance purchases is placed on consumers, cost containment in health care and quality improvement incentives naturally follow.","PeriodicalId":392992,"journal":{"name":"HEN: Canada (Sub-Topic)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HEN: Canada (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11575/SPPP.V9I0.42592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Canadians are not saving for the inevitable costs of drugs and long-term care which they will have to pay for out of pocket in their old age, and these costs could potentially be financially devastating for them. Later in life, when out-of-pocket health-care costs mount, those who previously enjoyed the security of a workplace insurance plan to cover such expenses will face a grim financial reality. Many aspects of care for older Canadians aren’t covered by this country’s single-payer health-care system. Besides prescription drugs, these include management of chronic conditions by ancillary health professionals, home care, long-term care, and dental and vision care. Statistics show that in 2012, Canadians’ private spending on health care totaled $60 billion, with private health insurance covering $24.5 billion of that amount. Coverage of health-care costs that don’t fall under Medicare’s purview is at present rather piecemeal. The non-refundable federal Medical Expense Tax Credit covers expenses only after the three-per-cent minimum, or first $2,171, of out-of-pocket costs have been paid by the individual. The Disability Tax Credit is available to those with a certified chronic disability, and these individuals are eligible for further support via the Registered Disability Savings Plan. A Caregiver Tax Credit is also available. The federal government has a golden opportunity to provide an incentive for Canadians to set aside money to pay not only for the often catastrophic medical and drug costs that can come with aging, but also to save so they can afford long-term care, or purchase private health insurance. Too many Canadians, unfortunately, believe that the federal government picks up the tab for long-term care. In fact, provincial subsidies are provided on a means-testing basis, thus leaving many better-off Canadians in the lurch when they can no longer live alone and must make the transition to long-term care. Providing more generous tax treatment of current and future out-of-pocket health costs, including insurance premiums, is an obvious way for the federal government to support Canadians to meet their health care needs and improve their well-being. Two existing vehicles can play an essential part of this plan. The government can change the currently non-refundable Medical Expenses Tax Credit and the refundable Medical Expenses Supplement so that out-ofpocket health-care costs are eligible from the first dollar. This would place no added burden on government if the exemption of employer-provided health benefits from employees’ taxable income were removed. Making an altered METC available to Canadians who pay their out-of-pocket costs from a registered health savings vehicle, which could be created within an RRSP to avoid extra administrative burdens, would provide them with an incentive to save. They could then either self-insure for future out-of-pocket health costs, or purchase private health insurance. A grant component could be added for lower-income families to make such savings incentives more widely diffuse. Treating health benefits as taxable income subject to the modified Medical Expenses Tax Credit would address efficiency and equity issues with the existing tax treatments of health-care costs while extending tax assistance for out-of-pocket costs to more of the population. When the onus for decision making about payments and insurance purchases is placed on consumers, cost containment in health care and quality improvement incentives naturally follow.
帮助加拿大人支付自付医疗保健费用的税收辅助方法
加拿大人没有为不可避免的药物和长期护理费用存钱,他们将不得不在老年时自掏腰包,这些费用可能会给他们带来经济上的毁灭性打击。在以后的生活中,当自付医疗费用增加时,那些以前享受工作场所保险计划来支付这些费用的人将面临严峻的财务现实。照顾加拿大老年人的许多方面都不包括在这个国家的单一付款人医疗保健系统中。除处方药外,这些措施还包括由辅助卫生专业人员管理慢性病、家庭护理、长期护理以及牙科和视力保健。统计数据显示,2012年,加拿大人在医疗保健方面的私人支出总额为600亿加元,其中私人医疗保险覆盖245亿加元。目前,不属于医疗保险范围的医疗费用覆盖范围相当零散。不可退还的联邦医疗费用税收抵免只包括在个人支付了最低3%的自付费用或第一个2,171美元之后的费用。残疾税收抵免适用于那些有慢性残疾证明的人,这些人有资格通过注册残疾储蓄计划获得进一步的支持。看护人税收抵免也可用。联邦政府有一个千载难逢的机会,可以激励加拿大人存钱,不仅用来支付老龄化带来的灾难性医疗和药品费用,还可以存钱,以便他们能够负担长期护理费用,或购买私人健康保险。不幸的是,太多的加拿大人相信联邦政府会为长期护理埋单。事实上,各省的补贴是在经济状况调查的基础上提供的,因此,当许多富裕的加拿大人不能再独自生活,必须过渡到长期护理时,他们就会陷入困境。对当前和未来的自付医疗费用(包括保险费)提供更慷慨的税收待遇,显然是联邦政府支持加拿大人满足其医疗保健需求和改善其福祉的一种方式。两辆现有车辆可以在这个计划中发挥重要作用。政府可以改变目前不可退还的医疗费用税收抵免和可退还的医疗费用补充,以便自付医疗费用从第一美元起就符合资格。如果从雇员的应税收入中取消雇主提供的医疗福利的豁免,这将不会给政府带来额外的负担。为避免额外的行政负担,可以在RRSP内设立一个注册的医疗储蓄机构,让加拿大人从自付费用中获得一种改变后的METC,这将激励他们储蓄。然后,他们可以为未来的自费医疗费用自行投保,或者购买私人医疗保险。可以增加对低收入家庭的补助,使这种储蓄激励更广泛地扩散。将健康福利视为应纳税收入,受修订后的医疗费用税收抵免的约束,将解决现有医疗费用税收待遇的效率和公平问题,同时将对自付费用的税收援助扩大到更多的人口。当有关支付和购买保险的决策责任落在消费者身上时,医疗保健方面的成本控制和质量改进激励措施自然就会随之而来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信