{"title":"The State of American Federalism 1988-1989","authors":"Michael A. Pagano, A. Bowman","doi":"10.2307/3330480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"President Ronald Reagan must have smiled as he left office in January 1989. Although seven years earlier his formal proposals to design a New Federalism met with only a modicum of success, if not outright failure,' the legacy of his federalism philosophy-defined principally as reducing federal domestic expenditures, easing federal restrictions on federal-aid funds, reducing federal regulation of state and local governments, minimizing direct federal-local relations, and devolving or sorting out program authority2-may be felt well into the next century. Indeed, given the budget deficits of the past decade coupled with the automatic triggers in the GrammRudman-Hollings law, and the evolving realignment in federal-state-local relations, the Reagan federalism agenda may have accomplished more than many pundits realize.3 The \"failure\" of the New Federalism initiative in 1982,","PeriodicalId":403250,"journal":{"name":"CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3330480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
President Ronald Reagan must have smiled as he left office in January 1989. Although seven years earlier his formal proposals to design a New Federalism met with only a modicum of success, if not outright failure,' the legacy of his federalism philosophy-defined principally as reducing federal domestic expenditures, easing federal restrictions on federal-aid funds, reducing federal regulation of state and local governments, minimizing direct federal-local relations, and devolving or sorting out program authority2-may be felt well into the next century. Indeed, given the budget deficits of the past decade coupled with the automatic triggers in the GrammRudman-Hollings law, and the evolving realignment in federal-state-local relations, the Reagan federalism agenda may have accomplished more than many pundits realize.3 The "failure" of the New Federalism initiative in 1982,