Analyzing Contracts: State of the Field, Mixed-Methods Guiding Steps, and an Illustrative Example

Karra Greenberg, Evgenia Jane Kitaevich, Siddharth Chaudhari, A. Kirkland
{"title":"Analyzing Contracts: State of the Field, Mixed-Methods Guiding Steps, and an Illustrative Example","authors":"Karra Greenberg, Evgenia Jane Kitaevich, Siddharth Chaudhari, A. Kirkland","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2022.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contracts are the underpinning of functional business, governmental, organizational, and inter-personal relations across the developed world. It is a methodological advance for contractual research scholars to transform qualitative contractual information into quantitative data to analyze if, how, and why the law is reflected and reproduced in contracts—potentially explaining the continuation or amelioration of social injustices—and/or if contractual content informs human behavior or vice versa. However, efforts to “quantitize” contracts and statistically study them are scattered across subfields without much methodological guidance. The linguistic complexity of many legal contacts, paired with few repositories, makes their comparative quantitative analysis challenging. Prior attempts to quantitatively analyze contracts often lack shared systematic methods for measuring specified textual content, transforming this information into a quantitative format, or statistically analyzing the produced data set. This article presents the power and promise of transforming legal contracts and other similar documents into quantitative data for analysis, reviews the research to date that does so in different ways, and then provides concrete guiding steps and an illustrative example of how to transform contractual content into quantitative data that are valid, reliable, and reproducible, increasing the quality of the data produced and supporting the important socio-legal conclusions that can be derived from their analysis.","PeriodicalId":168157,"journal":{"name":"Law & Social Inquiry","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Social Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contracts are the underpinning of functional business, governmental, organizational, and inter-personal relations across the developed world. It is a methodological advance for contractual research scholars to transform qualitative contractual information into quantitative data to analyze if, how, and why the law is reflected and reproduced in contracts—potentially explaining the continuation or amelioration of social injustices—and/or if contractual content informs human behavior or vice versa. However, efforts to “quantitize” contracts and statistically study them are scattered across subfields without much methodological guidance. The linguistic complexity of many legal contacts, paired with few repositories, makes their comparative quantitative analysis challenging. Prior attempts to quantitatively analyze contracts often lack shared systematic methods for measuring specified textual content, transforming this information into a quantitative format, or statistically analyzing the produced data set. This article presents the power and promise of transforming legal contracts and other similar documents into quantitative data for analysis, reviews the research to date that does so in different ways, and then provides concrete guiding steps and an illustrative example of how to transform contractual content into quantitative data that are valid, reliable, and reproducible, increasing the quality of the data produced and supporting the important socio-legal conclusions that can be derived from their analysis.
分析合同:领域现状、混合方法指导步骤和一个说明性例子
在发达国家,契约是商业、政府、组织和人际关系的基础。契约研究学者将定性契约信息转化为定量数据,分析法律是否、如何以及为什么在契约中得到反映和再现——这可能解释社会不公正的延续或改善——和/或契约内容是否影响人类行为,反之亦然,这是方法论上的进步。然而,对合同进行“量化”和统计研究的努力分散在各个子领域,没有多少方法论指导。许多法律合同的语言复杂性,加上很少的知识库,使得他们的比较定量分析具有挑战性。以前对合同进行定量分析的尝试通常缺乏共享的系统方法来测量指定的文本内容,将这些信息转换为定量格式,或对产生的数据集进行统计分析。本文介绍了将法律合同和其他类似文件转换为可供分析的定量数据的力量和前景,回顾了迄今为止以不同方式进行的研究,然后提供了具体的指导步骤和一个说明性示例,说明如何将合同内容转换为有效、可靠和可复制的定量数据。提高所产生数据的质量,并支持可从其分析中得出的重要社会法律结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信