El Evangelio de Juan como generador de grandes crisis teológicas: aportes para una nueva lectura de las exégesis de Heracleón y de Orígenes

P. Ciner
{"title":"El Evangelio de Juan como generador de grandes crisis teológicas: aportes para una nueva lectura de las exégesis de Heracleón y de Orígenes","authors":"P. Ciner","doi":"10.46553/teo.59.137.2022.p59-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Today, Patristic Studies approach the exciting theological problems that arose in the first centuries of our era from new paradigms of analysis. In this sense, the existence of a diversity of currents in early Christianity is an indisputable fact for contemporary research, since there is no doubt that this pluriformity of positions arose from the diversity of interpretations of texts and theological notions. The classification of the various Christianities into \"proto-orthodox or proto-Catho-lic, Judeo-Christian and Gnostic\" that contemporary scholars have made is very useful for accessing a text such as Origen's Commentary on the Gospel of John, to which we will refer on this article. But it must be further expanded, for Origen's theology, while closer to what has come to be called proto-orthodoxy, has unique and distinctive characteristics with respect to other authors who are placed in this tradition. It was these unique characteristics that were so misunderstood by posterity and which ended up producing the condemnations of the Council of Constantinople in 553. As a foretaste of what we shall develop later, we shall call this Christianity mystical-esoteric.","PeriodicalId":386951,"journal":{"name":"Teología","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/teo.59.137.2022.p59-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Today, Patristic Studies approach the exciting theological problems that arose in the first centuries of our era from new paradigms of analysis. In this sense, the existence of a diversity of currents in early Christianity is an indisputable fact for contemporary research, since there is no doubt that this pluriformity of positions arose from the diversity of interpretations of texts and theological notions. The classification of the various Christianities into "proto-orthodox or proto-Catho-lic, Judeo-Christian and Gnostic" that contemporary scholars have made is very useful for accessing a text such as Origen's Commentary on the Gospel of John, to which we will refer on this article. But it must be further expanded, for Origen's theology, while closer to what has come to be called proto-orthodoxy, has unique and distinctive characteristics with respect to other authors who are placed in this tradition. It was these unique characteristics that were so misunderstood by posterity and which ended up producing the condemnations of the Council of Constantinople in 553. As a foretaste of what we shall develop later, we shall call this Christianity mystical-esoteric.
约翰福音作为重大神学危机的产生者:对赫拉克利翁和奥利金注释的新解读的贡献
《今日教父研究》从新的分析范式出发,探讨在我们这个时代最初几个世纪出现的令人兴奋的神学问题。从这个意义上说,在当代研究中,早期基督教中存在多种流派是一个不争的事实,因为毫无疑问,这种立场的多样性源于对文本和神学观念的解释的多样性。当代学者将各种基督教分类为“原始正统或原始天主教、犹太-基督教和诺斯替教”,这对理解俄利根的《约翰福音注释》等文本非常有用,我们将在本文中提到这本书。但它必须进一步扩大,为奥利金的神学,而更接近什么已经被称为原始正统,具有独特的和鲜明的特点,尊重其他作者谁被置于这一传统。正是这些独特的特征被后人误解,最终导致了553年君士坦丁堡会议的谴责。我们将把这种基督教称为神秘的,深奥的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信