What We Want, Why We Want It: K-12 Educators' Evidence Use to Support their Grant Proposals

J. Malin, Chris Brown, Andrew Saultz
{"title":"What We Want, Why We Want It: K-12 Educators' Evidence Use to Support their Grant Proposals","authors":"J. Malin, Chris Brown, Andrew Saultz","doi":"10.22230/IJEPL.2019V15N3A837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed educators’ requests for grant funding to purchase desired educational resources or services. Specifically, it examined to what extent, and how, educators utilized research and other forms of evidence to support their decision-making. References to research were sparse, though applicants sometimes referred to local data or small-scale trials. Conceptual research use likely also lurked beneath certain statements. Applicant educators also showed special concern for certaintopics, including student engagement/motivation and enhancing the cultural relevance of programming. The proposals varied considerably in terms of the robustness of underlying theories of action. This line of inquiry contributes to understandings both regarding a) educators’ use of research and other knowledge sources to support their professional decision-making; and b) the nature of evidence use in education.","PeriodicalId":325710,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/IJEPL.2019V15N3A837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study analyzed educators’ requests for grant funding to purchase desired educational resources or services. Specifically, it examined to what extent, and how, educators utilized research and other forms of evidence to support their decision-making. References to research were sparse, though applicants sometimes referred to local data or small-scale trials. Conceptual research use likely also lurked beneath certain statements. Applicant educators also showed special concern for certaintopics, including student engagement/motivation and enhancing the cultural relevance of programming. The proposals varied considerably in terms of the robustness of underlying theories of action. This line of inquiry contributes to understandings both regarding a) educators’ use of research and other knowledge sources to support their professional decision-making; and b) the nature of evidence use in education.
我们想要什么,为什么我们想要:K-12教育工作者的证据用来支持他们的拨款提案
本研究分析了教育工作者为购买所需的教育资源或服务而申请拨款的情况。具体来说,它考察了教育工作者在多大程度上以及如何利用研究和其他形式的证据来支持他们的决策。虽然申请人有时会提到当地数据或小规模试验,但对研究的参考很少。概念研究的使用也可能隐藏在某些陈述之下。申请教育工作者还特别关注某些主题,包括学生参与/动机和增强编程的文化相关性。这些建议在基本行动理论的稳健性方面差别很大。这条探究线有助于以下两方面的理解:a)教育者使用研究和其他知识来源来支持他们的专业决策;b)教育中证据使用的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信