Mental Accounting and Taxpayer Compliance: Insights into the Referent Point that Separates Honest from Dishonest Behavior

I. Burt, L. Thorne, Jay K. Walker
{"title":"Mental Accounting and Taxpayer Compliance: Insights into the Referent Point that Separates Honest from Dishonest Behavior","authors":"I. Burt, L. Thorne, Jay K. Walker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3098194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical results grounded in prospect theory shows that taxpayers’ compliance is a function of whether they are in a tax gain or loss position, being more likely to “cheat” when they perceive that they are in a tax loss as compared to tax gain. Nevertheless, what remains to be determined is how taxpayers mentally determine what is a tax loss or a tax gain. We conduct a field experiment when taxpayers are filing actual returns to better determine the actual referent point that separates tax gains from tax losses. We find that mental categorization of taxes paid and owed is critical to taxpayer determination of their referent point, which takes into account what they anticipate they will owe or receive upon filing their tax return. From a theoretical perspective, our research shows that current perceptions of their expected asset position shapes the referent point. From a practical perspective, our findings suggest that taxpayer honesty depends primarily on how they separate tax withholdings from their current net worth.","PeriodicalId":382675,"journal":{"name":"Concurrent Sessions","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrent Sessions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empirical results grounded in prospect theory shows that taxpayers’ compliance is a function of whether they are in a tax gain or loss position, being more likely to “cheat” when they perceive that they are in a tax loss as compared to tax gain. Nevertheless, what remains to be determined is how taxpayers mentally determine what is a tax loss or a tax gain. We conduct a field experiment when taxpayers are filing actual returns to better determine the actual referent point that separates tax gains from tax losses. We find that mental categorization of taxes paid and owed is critical to taxpayer determination of their referent point, which takes into account what they anticipate they will owe or receive upon filing their tax return. From a theoretical perspective, our research shows that current perceptions of their expected asset position shapes the referent point. From a practical perspective, our findings suggest that taxpayer honesty depends primarily on how they separate tax withholdings from their current net worth.
心理会计与纳税人合规:对区分诚实与不诚实行为的参照点的洞察
基于前景理论的实证结果表明,纳税人的合规性是一个函数,无论他们是处于税收收益还是损失的位置,当他们意识到自己处于税收损失而不是税收收益时,他们更有可能“欺骗”。然而,仍有待确定的是纳税人如何在心理上判断什么是税收损失,什么是税收收益。我们在纳税人申报实际纳税申报表时进行实地实验,以更好地确定区分税收收益和税收损失的实际参照点。我们发现,纳税和欠税的心理分类对纳税人确定其参照点至关重要,这考虑到他们在提交纳税申报表时预计他们将欠或收到的税款。从理论角度来看,我们的研究表明,当前对预期资产头寸的看法塑造了参照点。从实际的角度来看,我们的研究结果表明,纳税人的诚实主要取决于他们如何将预扣税与当前的净资产分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信