Imputation Principle of Product Liability in the Perspective of Law and Economics: Concurrence of Contract Law and Tort Law

Jing Zhou
{"title":"Imputation Principle of Product Liability in the Perspective of Law and Economics: Concurrence of Contract Law and Tort Law","authors":"Jing Zhou","doi":"10.23977/infse.2023.040209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The information asymmetry of market players leads to product safety becoming a regulatory issue. From the perspective of law and economics, the consumer principle requires manufacturers to balance investment in product safety with consumer insurance benefits. The producer principle requires producers to face the conflict between product safety improvements and product innovation and to balance the two. Product liability under Chinese law tends to favour the former. Singh's economic analysis model of effective product liability rules (2001) demonstrates the relative superiority of strict liability, but it is not perfect. It is hoped that, by analysis from the perspective of law and economics, the legal regime relating to product liability in China will move towards effective improvements that balance the interests of the individual and those of society.","PeriodicalId":423306,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems and Economics","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/infse.2023.040209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The information asymmetry of market players leads to product safety becoming a regulatory issue. From the perspective of law and economics, the consumer principle requires manufacturers to balance investment in product safety with consumer insurance benefits. The producer principle requires producers to face the conflict between product safety improvements and product innovation and to balance the two. Product liability under Chinese law tends to favour the former. Singh's economic analysis model of effective product liability rules (2001) demonstrates the relative superiority of strict liability, but it is not perfect. It is hoped that, by analysis from the perspective of law and economics, the legal regime relating to product liability in China will move towards effective improvements that balance the interests of the individual and those of society.
法经济学视域下的产品责任归责原则:合同法与侵权行为法的竞合
市场主体的信息不对称导致产品安全成为一个监管问题。从法律和经济学的角度来看,消费者原则要求制造商在产品安全投资与消费者保险利益之间取得平衡。生产者原则要求生产者面对产品安全改进与产品创新的冲突,并平衡两者。中国法律规定的产品责任倾向于前者。Singh(2001)的有效产品责任规则经济分析模型证明了严格责任的相对优越性,但并不完善。希望通过从法学和经济学的角度进行分析,中国有关产品责任的法律制度将朝着平衡个人利益和社会利益的有效改进方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信