Analysis and Evaluation of the Development of Various k-Values for Use in Design

Abstract

Inconsistency exists between common conversions from soil index properties (e.g., CBR) to a design k-value and a widespread nomograph that has become the definitive industry reference on the topic in the United States. Propagation of these inconsistencies into guidance from groups like the American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA) and American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committees 330 and 360 has contributed to confusion in the industry. Advancements between the pavement and slab-on-ground communities have occurred in parallel but are inconsistent with each other, thus adding more confusion. ACPA developed a conversion set to better align the industry on a static k-value for design. While the ACPA model is included in StreetPave, PavementDesigner.org, and the ACPA App Library, outdated conversion equations are frequently used due to familiarity and lack of understanding of the underlying principles. This paper presents a summary of the industry's prior practices and recommendations, a detailing of the approach proposed by ACPA, and guidance on which k-value is recommended for design of concrete pavements and slabs-on-ground.