Clinical evaluation and assessment of laser irradiation on the stability of orthodontic implant - A prospective experimental study

NamrataV Shehare, Suchita S Daokar, Dhananjay B Ghunawat, HarshaJ Kaurani
{"title":"Clinical evaluation and assessment of laser irradiation on the stability of orthodontic implant - A prospective experimental study","authors":"NamrataV Shehare, Suchita S Daokar, Dhananjay B Ghunawat, HarshaJ Kaurani","doi":"10.4103/sidj.sidj_20_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Currently, orthodontic implants have reached a peak where they are considered a dependable modality to provide temporary supplemental anchoring in orthodontic therapy. When absolute anchoring is a necessity or in cases of minimally cooperative patients, these devices can help manage skeletal anchorage. However, its failure is a serious multi-factorial issue that happens during orthodontic treatment. The stability of the mini-implant is crucial to the outcome of orthodontic intervention. Approaches to increasing the stability of the mini-implant were researched. Hence, this study was carried out to compare and contrast and clinically assess the integrity of orthodontic implants over time. Subjects and Methods: Split mouth technique of treatment was carried out on 16 patients, i.e., one side of the mandible was considered as the experimental group (implant site irradiated with laser after placement), and the other was considered as the control side (implant site not irradiated with laser). Titanium mini-implants of the dimensions 1.5 mm diameter and 6 mm length were employed in the present study. They were positioned in the inter radicular space between the first molar and second premolar in the mandibular posterior region, 7 mm apical to the alveolar crest. During the whole process, the laser utilized was a multimode GaAs diode laser with a wavelength of 980 nm. It had 0.5–10 W output power which was adjustable with the frequency of 1–20 kHz and its main body input voltage was DC12 to further analyze the stability of the implant which in turn would aid in success assessment, the resonance frequency concept was utilized. The readings were recorded (T0) after insertion, (T1) 24 h after insertion, (T2) 2 weeks after insertion, (T3) 4 weeks after insertion, (T4) 6 weeks after insertion, and (T5) 8 weeks after insertion. The higher the implant stability quotient values the greater the stability and hence the optimal loading time. Results: The test employed for statistical analysis was Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis, and analysis of variance test. After analysis of all the readings, it was found that low-level laser therapy has a significant role in the stability of orthodontic mini-implant. Conclusion: The findings from this study suggest that low-level laser irradiation at the time of implant placement controls the inflammatory reaction around the implant and improves its stability.","PeriodicalId":220601,"journal":{"name":"The Saint′s International Dental Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Saint′s International Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sidj.sidj_20_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, orthodontic implants have reached a peak where they are considered a dependable modality to provide temporary supplemental anchoring in orthodontic therapy. When absolute anchoring is a necessity or in cases of minimally cooperative patients, these devices can help manage skeletal anchorage. However, its failure is a serious multi-factorial issue that happens during orthodontic treatment. The stability of the mini-implant is crucial to the outcome of orthodontic intervention. Approaches to increasing the stability of the mini-implant were researched. Hence, this study was carried out to compare and contrast and clinically assess the integrity of orthodontic implants over time. Subjects and Methods: Split mouth technique of treatment was carried out on 16 patients, i.e., one side of the mandible was considered as the experimental group (implant site irradiated with laser after placement), and the other was considered as the control side (implant site not irradiated with laser). Titanium mini-implants of the dimensions 1.5 mm diameter and 6 mm length were employed in the present study. They were positioned in the inter radicular space between the first molar and second premolar in the mandibular posterior region, 7 mm apical to the alveolar crest. During the whole process, the laser utilized was a multimode GaAs diode laser with a wavelength of 980 nm. It had 0.5–10 W output power which was adjustable with the frequency of 1–20 kHz and its main body input voltage was DC12 to further analyze the stability of the implant which in turn would aid in success assessment, the resonance frequency concept was utilized. The readings were recorded (T0) after insertion, (T1) 24 h after insertion, (T2) 2 weeks after insertion, (T3) 4 weeks after insertion, (T4) 6 weeks after insertion, and (T5) 8 weeks after insertion. The higher the implant stability quotient values the greater the stability and hence the optimal loading time. Results: The test employed for statistical analysis was Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis, and analysis of variance test. After analysis of all the readings, it was found that low-level laser therapy has a significant role in the stability of orthodontic mini-implant. Conclusion: The findings from this study suggest that low-level laser irradiation at the time of implant placement controls the inflammatory reaction around the implant and improves its stability.
激光照射对正畸种植体稳定性的临床评价与评价——一项前瞻性实验研究
背景:目前,正畸种植体已经达到了一个高峰,它们被认为是一种可靠的方式,在正畸治疗中提供暂时的补充锚定。当绝对锚定是必要的,或在病例的最低限度的合作患者,这些装置可以帮助管理骨骼锚定。然而,它的失败是一个严重的多因素问题,发生在正畸治疗。微型种植体的稳定性对正畸干预的结果至关重要。研究了提高微型种植体稳定性的方法。因此,本研究进行比较和对比,临床评估正畸种植体的完整性随时间的变化。对象和方法:对16例患者采用裂口治疗技术,即一侧下颌骨作为实验组(放置后激光照射种植部位),另一侧下颌骨作为对照组(未激光照射种植部位)。本研究采用直径1.5 mm、长度6 mm的微型钛种植体。他们被放置在下颌后区第一磨牙和第二前磨牙之间的根间间隙,顶端到牙槽嵴7毫米。在整个过程中,使用的激光器是波长为980 nm的多模砷化镓二极管激光器。它的输出功率为0.5-10 W,可调频率为1-20 kHz,其主体输入电压为DC12,为了进一步分析植入物的稳定性,从而有助于成功评估,我们利用了共振频率的概念。记录插入后(T0)、(T1) 24 h、(T2) 2周、(T3) 4周、(T4) 6周、(T5) 8周的读数。植入物稳定商值越高,稳定性越好,因此最佳加载时间越长。结果:统计分析采用Mann-Whitney U、Kruskal Wallis检验,方差分析检验。通过对所有读数的分析,发现低水平激光治疗对正畸微型种植体的稳定性有显著的作用。结论:本研究结果提示种植体放置时低强度激光照射可以控制种植体周围的炎症反应,提高种植体的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信