Predictability in securities price formation: differences between developed and emerging markets

S. Camilleri, S. Vassallo, Y. Bai
{"title":"Predictability in securities price formation: differences between developed and emerging markets","authors":"S. Camilleri, S. Vassallo, Y. Bai","doi":"10.1108/jcms-07-2020-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper examines whether there are differences in the nature of the price discovery process across established versus emerging stock markets using a twenty-country sample.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyse security returns for traces of predictability or non-randomness using variance ratio tests, Granger-Causality models and runs tests.FindingsThe findings pinpoint at predictabilities which seem inconsistent with market efficiency, and they suggest that the inherent cause of predictability differs across groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors present empirical evidence which may be used to attain a deeper understanding of the links between predictability and market efficiency, in view of the conflicting evidence in prior literature.Practical implicationsWhilst the pricing process in emerging markets may be hindered by delayed adjustments, in case of established markets it seems that there is a higher tendency for price reversals which could be due to prior over-reactions.Originality/valueThis study presents evidence of substantial differences in predictability across developed and emerging markets which was gleaned through the rigorous application of different empirical tests.","PeriodicalId":118429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Capital Markets Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Capital Markets Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcms-07-2020-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis paper examines whether there are differences in the nature of the price discovery process across established versus emerging stock markets using a twenty-country sample.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyse security returns for traces of predictability or non-randomness using variance ratio tests, Granger-Causality models and runs tests.FindingsThe findings pinpoint at predictabilities which seem inconsistent with market efficiency, and they suggest that the inherent cause of predictability differs across groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors present empirical evidence which may be used to attain a deeper understanding of the links between predictability and market efficiency, in view of the conflicting evidence in prior literature.Practical implicationsWhilst the pricing process in emerging markets may be hindered by delayed adjustments, in case of established markets it seems that there is a higher tendency for price reversals which could be due to prior over-reactions.Originality/valueThis study presents evidence of substantial differences in predictability across developed and emerging markets which was gleaned through the rigorous application of different empirical tests.
证券价格形成的可预测性:发达市场与新兴市场的差异
本文使用20个国家的样本来检验在成熟和新兴股票市场中价格发现过程的性质是否存在差异。设计/方法/方法作者使用方差比测试、格兰杰因果关系模型和运行测试来分析可预测性或非随机性的安全回报痕迹。研究结果指出了与市场效率似乎不一致的可预测性,并表明可预测性的内在原因因群体而异。研究的局限性/意义鉴于先前文献中相互矛盾的证据,作者提出的经验证据可用于更深入地理解可预测性与市场效率之间的联系。虽然新兴市场的定价过程可能会受到延迟调整的阻碍,但在成熟市场,似乎有更高的价格反转趋势,这可能是由于先前的过度反应。原创性/价值本研究提出了发达市场和新兴市场在可预测性方面存在重大差异的证据,这些差异是通过严格应用不同的实证测试收集到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信