{"title":"Equity Exchange Fees and Revenues","authors":"Ike Brannon, R. Jennings","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3391834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fees charged by U.S. equity exchanges for services such as non-core market data, connectivity, and co-location have become controversial. Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission required the exchanges justify hundreds of past fee increases. In their defense, exchanges argue that the fees that they charge are constrained by competition for order flow between the three major exchange families. To the authors’ knowledge, no extant work associates fee changes with exchange revenues. We gather fee increases and exchange financial statement information between 2006 and 2016 to examine the relation between fees and revenues. We find that, when statistically significant, revenue increases with fee increases without a consistently strong volume effect, which suggests that any decrease in subscriptions due to fee increases is more than offset by the revenue increase from the remaining subscribers.","PeriodicalId":412480,"journal":{"name":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3391834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Fees charged by U.S. equity exchanges for services such as non-core market data, connectivity, and co-location have become controversial. Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission required the exchanges justify hundreds of past fee increases. In their defense, exchanges argue that the fees that they charge are constrained by competition for order flow between the three major exchange families. To the authors’ knowledge, no extant work associates fee changes with exchange revenues. We gather fee increases and exchange financial statement information between 2006 and 2016 to examine the relation between fees and revenues. We find that, when statistically significant, revenue increases with fee increases without a consistently strong volume effect, which suggests that any decrease in subscriptions due to fee increases is more than offset by the revenue increase from the remaining subscribers.
美国股票交易所对非核心市场数据、连接和托管等服务收取的费用已成为争议。最近,美国证券交易委员会(Securities and Exchange Commission)要求交易所证明过去数百次收费上涨的合理性。交易所为自己辩护称,它们收取的费用受到三大交易所家族之间对订单流竞争的限制。据作者所知,没有现存的工作将费用变化与交换收入联系起来。我们收集了2006年至2016年期间的费用增长并交换了财务报表信息,以检查费用与收入之间的关系。我们发现,在统计上显著的情况下,收入随着费用的增加而增加,而没有持续强烈的数量效应,这表明,由于费用增加而导致的订阅量减少,可以被剩余订阅量的收入增加所抵消。