Equity Exchange Fees and Revenues

Ike Brannon, R. Jennings
{"title":"Equity Exchange Fees and Revenues","authors":"Ike Brannon, R. Jennings","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3391834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fees charged by U.S. equity exchanges for services such as non-core market data, connectivity, and co-location have become controversial. Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission required the exchanges justify hundreds of past fee increases. In their defense, exchanges argue that the fees that they charge are constrained by competition for order flow between the three major exchange families. To the authors’ knowledge, no extant work associates fee changes with exchange revenues. We gather fee increases and exchange financial statement information between 2006 and 2016 to examine the relation between fees and revenues. We find that, when statistically significant, revenue increases with fee increases without a consistently strong volume effect, which suggests that any decrease in subscriptions due to fee increases is more than offset by the revenue increase from the remaining subscribers.","PeriodicalId":412480,"journal":{"name":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3391834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Fees charged by U.S. equity exchanges for services such as non-core market data, connectivity, and co-location have become controversial. Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission required the exchanges justify hundreds of past fee increases. In their defense, exchanges argue that the fees that they charge are constrained by competition for order flow between the three major exchange families. To the authors’ knowledge, no extant work associates fee changes with exchange revenues. We gather fee increases and exchange financial statement information between 2006 and 2016 to examine the relation between fees and revenues. We find that, when statistically significant, revenue increases with fee increases without a consistently strong volume effect, which suggests that any decrease in subscriptions due to fee increases is more than offset by the revenue increase from the remaining subscribers.
股权交换费用及收入
美国股票交易所对非核心市场数据、连接和托管等服务收取的费用已成为争议。最近,美国证券交易委员会(Securities and Exchange Commission)要求交易所证明过去数百次收费上涨的合理性。交易所为自己辩护称,它们收取的费用受到三大交易所家族之间对订单流竞争的限制。据作者所知,没有现存的工作将费用变化与交换收入联系起来。我们收集了2006年至2016年期间的费用增长并交换了财务报表信息,以检查费用与收入之间的关系。我们发现,在统计上显著的情况下,收入随着费用的增加而增加,而没有持续强烈的数量效应,这表明,由于费用增加而导致的订阅量减少,可以被剩余订阅量的收入增加所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信