{"title":"The monster and the corpse: puppetry and the uncanniness of gender performance","authors":"L. Purcell-Gates","doi":"10.4324/9781315225999-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following a work-in-progress performance of Wattle and Daub's puppet opera ‘The Depraved Appetite of Tarrare the Freak’, as artists and audience mingled in the theatre bar for informal feedback over drinks, one male audience member expressed annoyance at the design of the only female puppet in the show: 'You need to make her lips and cheeks red, and give her some hair,’ he explained, ‘otherwise we can't tell she's a woman.' \n \nThis ambiguity is telling; no one complained that the male puppets’ genders were confusing. Much more labour must go into representing a puppet as female, revealing the myth of ‘neutrality’—the neutral body is, in fact, read as male. This raises the question of the role of ambiguity when a ‘neutral’ puppet insists on being female. Both Freud’s unheimliche (1919) and Masahiro Mori’s uncanny valley effect (1970) link the uncanny with ambiguity; as dead-yet-animated objects, puppets therefore find an easy home within this designation. A closer look reveals intersectional issues at play; Leigh Johnson, for instance, has linked the uncanny valley effect with racial ambiguity (2009). \n \nI wish to push this link further by examining the uncanniness of the apparently ‘neutral’ puppet body—a puppet lacking clear female markers such as long hair, breasts, red cheeks and lips—performing as female. Connecting the construction of neutrality (the sterile body of the corpse, unmarked by non-normative identity signifiers) to anxieties surrounding contamination, I link this contamination to the monstrous body of the ambiguously female, overflowing in signification. I suggest that while puppetry is a site for gender bias via the myth of neutrality, it also represents a subversive site with the potential to trouble and reveal such identity constructions, through a productive uncanniness that asks us not just to experience, but to linger within the ambiguity of the monstrous body.","PeriodicalId":101605,"journal":{"name":"Women and Puppetry","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Puppetry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315225999-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Following a work-in-progress performance of Wattle and Daub's puppet opera ‘The Depraved Appetite of Tarrare the Freak’, as artists and audience mingled in the theatre bar for informal feedback over drinks, one male audience member expressed annoyance at the design of the only female puppet in the show: 'You need to make her lips and cheeks red, and give her some hair,’ he explained, ‘otherwise we can't tell she's a woman.'
This ambiguity is telling; no one complained that the male puppets’ genders were confusing. Much more labour must go into representing a puppet as female, revealing the myth of ‘neutrality’—the neutral body is, in fact, read as male. This raises the question of the role of ambiguity when a ‘neutral’ puppet insists on being female. Both Freud’s unheimliche (1919) and Masahiro Mori’s uncanny valley effect (1970) link the uncanny with ambiguity; as dead-yet-animated objects, puppets therefore find an easy home within this designation. A closer look reveals intersectional issues at play; Leigh Johnson, for instance, has linked the uncanny valley effect with racial ambiguity (2009).
I wish to push this link further by examining the uncanniness of the apparently ‘neutral’ puppet body—a puppet lacking clear female markers such as long hair, breasts, red cheeks and lips—performing as female. Connecting the construction of neutrality (the sterile body of the corpse, unmarked by non-normative identity signifiers) to anxieties surrounding contamination, I link this contamination to the monstrous body of the ambiguously female, overflowing in signification. I suggest that while puppetry is a site for gender bias via the myth of neutrality, it also represents a subversive site with the potential to trouble and reveal such identity constructions, through a productive uncanniness that asks us not just to experience, but to linger within the ambiguity of the monstrous body.
在沃特尔和道布的木偶剧《怪物塔拉雷的邪恶欲望》(The Depraved Appetite of The Freak)正在进行的演出结束后,艺术家和观众在剧院的酒吧里喝着酒,非正式地交流意见。一位男性观众对演出中唯一的女性木偶的设计表示不满:“你需要把她的嘴唇和脸颊染红,再给她弄点头发,”他解释说,“否则我们就看不出她是女人。”这种模棱两可很能说明问题;没有人抱怨男性木偶的性别令人困惑。要把一个木偶描绘成女性,必须付出更多的劳动,这就揭示了“中性”的神话——事实上,中性的身体被解读为男性。当一个“中立”的木偶坚持要成为女性时,这就提出了一个模棱两可的问题。弗洛伊德的unheimliche(1919)和Masahiro Mori的恐怖谷效应(1970)都将神秘与模糊性联系起来;作为死而有生气的物体,木偶因此在这个名称中找到了一个轻松的家。仔细观察就会发现其中的交叉问题;例如,Leigh Johnson将恐怖谷效应与种族模糊性联系在一起(2009)。我希望通过研究看似“中性”的木偶身体的不可思议之处来进一步推动这一联系——木偶缺乏明显的女性特征,如长发、乳房、红脸颊和嘴唇——以女性的身份表演。我把中立性的建构(尸体的无菌身体,没有非规范的身份能指的标记)与围绕污染的焦虑联系起来,把这种污染与模糊的女性的怪物身体联系起来,充满了意义。我认为,虽然木偶戏通过中性的神话成为性别偏见的场所,但它也代表了一个颠覆性的场所,有可能麻烦并揭示这种身份结构,通过一种富有生产力的怪诞,要求我们不仅要体验,而且要在怪物身体的模糊性中徘徊。