High-fidelity turbulence modeling for numerical wave tank applications: Evaluation of the scale-resolving PANS approach

Haneesha Iphineni, B. Windén, S. Girimaji
{"title":"High-fidelity turbulence modeling for numerical wave tank applications: Evaluation of the scale-resolving PANS approach","authors":"Haneesha Iphineni, B. Windén, S. Girimaji","doi":"10.5957/tos-2022-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For analyzing vessel seakeeping, platform wave loads and similar tasks, potential flow-based methods are still the workhorse Numerical Wave Tank (NWT) used by industry. Recently, NWTs have employed more advanced viscous flow simulation methods. These are commonly based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach. RANS is often preferred by industry due to it’s lower computational cost in relation to better scale resolving methods. The RANS approach however, has limits in NWT applications. Firstly, it is not suited for studying unsteady turbulence phenomena at different scales of wave and fluid motion. Secondly, RANS turbulence models assume that the energy transport in turbulent flows can be described as a dissipative process. In a NWT where large parts of the flow is unsteady, but not dominated by turbulent variations, this could lead to non-physical dissipation of waves.\n Focusing on the second issue, the applicability of the Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) approach in NWTs is investigated in this paper. PANS is a suite of turbulence models of varying modeled to resolved scale ratios ranging from RANS to Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). PANS modeling allows for more direct control of how energy dissipation is treated. It is hypothesized that this will be beneficial in NWTs by reducing non-physical dissipation of waves.\n Initial results for a regular wave tank are promising. About 40% of the wave amplitude was lost downstream with the RANS approach versus less than 3% with the PANS approach; using the same computational grid and with only a slight increase in the computational effort. Similar results were obtained for a self-contained ”dam break” simulation.","PeriodicalId":108360,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, February 22, 2022","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, February 22, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5957/tos-2022-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For analyzing vessel seakeeping, platform wave loads and similar tasks, potential flow-based methods are still the workhorse Numerical Wave Tank (NWT) used by industry. Recently, NWTs have employed more advanced viscous flow simulation methods. These are commonly based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach. RANS is often preferred by industry due to it’s lower computational cost in relation to better scale resolving methods. The RANS approach however, has limits in NWT applications. Firstly, it is not suited for studying unsteady turbulence phenomena at different scales of wave and fluid motion. Secondly, RANS turbulence models assume that the energy transport in turbulent flows can be described as a dissipative process. In a NWT where large parts of the flow is unsteady, but not dominated by turbulent variations, this could lead to non-physical dissipation of waves. Focusing on the second issue, the applicability of the Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) approach in NWTs is investigated in this paper. PANS is a suite of turbulence models of varying modeled to resolved scale ratios ranging from RANS to Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). PANS modeling allows for more direct control of how energy dissipation is treated. It is hypothesized that this will be beneficial in NWTs by reducing non-physical dissipation of waves. Initial results for a regular wave tank are promising. About 40% of the wave amplitude was lost downstream with the RANS approach versus less than 3% with the PANS approach; using the same computational grid and with only a slight increase in the computational effort. Similar results were obtained for a self-contained ”dam break” simulation.
数值波槽应用的高保真湍流建模:尺度分辨PANS方法的评价
对于分析船舶耐浪性、平台波浪载荷和类似任务,基于势流的方法仍然是工业上使用的主要数值波浪箱(NWT)。近年来,NWTs采用了更先进的粘性流动模拟方法。这些通常基于reynolds - average Navier-Stokes (RANS)方法。由于相对于更好的尺度解析方法,RANS的计算成本较低,因此通常受到工业界的青睐。然而,RANS方法在NWT应用中有局限性。首先,它不适合研究不同尺度的波动和流体运动的非定常湍流现象。其次,RANS湍流模型假设湍流中的能量输运可以描述为耗散过程。在西北西北地区,大部分流动是非定常的,但不受湍流变化的支配,这可能导致波的非物理耗散。针对第二个问题,本文研究了部分平均Navier-Stokes (PANS)方法在NWTs中的适用性。PANS是一套从RANS到直接数值模拟(DNS)的不同模型到可分辨尺度比的湍流模型。PANS模型允许更直接地控制如何处理能量耗散。据推测,这将有利于减少波的非物理耗散。常规波浪槽的初步结果是有希望的。RANS方法在下游损失了约40%的波幅,而PANS方法在下游损失了不到3%;使用相同的计算网格,而计算工作量仅略有增加。在一个独立的“溃坝”模拟中也得到了类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信