Laminated Timber Versus on-Site Cast Concrete: A Comparative Study

Torstein Østnor, S. Faanes, O. Lædre
{"title":"Laminated Timber Versus on-Site Cast Concrete: A Comparative Study","authors":"Torstein Østnor, S. Faanes, O. Lædre","doi":"10.24928/2018/0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laminated-timber is a relatively new construction material for multi-story buildings. With this type of structural engineered wood product, timber is glue laminated to increase its constructive strength. Laminated-timber represents an opportunity to lower GHGemissions, while traditional on-site cast concrete is believed to be cheaper. The study examines differences between construction in laminated timber and cast concrete, and pros and cons associated with construction in laminated timber. The study began with a literature review. Then the construction of two neighboring apartment buildings that used Last-Planner during both design and construction were studied. Takt-planning was used in the production planning. Twelve interviews represent the main source of data and was supplemented with a study of documents and direct observations in design meetings. Use of laminated timber requires more resources in the design phase compared with the use of cast concrete. Fire and acoustic regulations, in particular, demand new construction guidelines. However, use of laminated timber saves time and provides a cleaner working environment during construction. Under the right circumstances, laminated timber appears to outperform on-site cast concrete. This study suggests Lean measures for contractors that want to benefit from the advantages of laminated timber and improve such construction.","PeriodicalId":419313,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Laminated-timber is a relatively new construction material for multi-story buildings. With this type of structural engineered wood product, timber is glue laminated to increase its constructive strength. Laminated-timber represents an opportunity to lower GHGemissions, while traditional on-site cast concrete is believed to be cheaper. The study examines differences between construction in laminated timber and cast concrete, and pros and cons associated with construction in laminated timber. The study began with a literature review. Then the construction of two neighboring apartment buildings that used Last-Planner during both design and construction were studied. Takt-planning was used in the production planning. Twelve interviews represent the main source of data and was supplemented with a study of documents and direct observations in design meetings. Use of laminated timber requires more resources in the design phase compared with the use of cast concrete. Fire and acoustic regulations, in particular, demand new construction guidelines. However, use of laminated timber saves time and provides a cleaner working environment during construction. Under the right circumstances, laminated timber appears to outperform on-site cast concrete. This study suggests Lean measures for contractors that want to benefit from the advantages of laminated timber and improve such construction.
层压木材与现场浇筑混凝土:比较研究
层压木材是一种较新的多层建筑材料。使用这种类型的结构工程木制品,木材被胶水层压以增加其构造强度。层压木材代表了降低温室气体排放的机会,而传统的现场浇筑混凝土被认为更便宜。该研究考察了层压木材和浇筑混凝土结构之间的差异,以及层压木材结构的利弊。这项研究从文献综述开始。然后对相邻的两栋公寓楼的设计和施工过程中使用Last-Planner进行了研究。生产计划采用节拍计划法。12个访谈代表了数据的主要来源,并辅以对文件的研究和设计会议上的直接观察。与使用浇筑混凝土相比,使用层压木材在设计阶段需要更多的资源。消防和声学法规尤其需要新的建筑指南。然而,使用层压木材节省了时间,并在施工期间提供了一个更清洁的工作环境。在适当的情况下,层压木材似乎优于现场浇筑混凝土。本研究建议精益措施的承包商,希望从层压木材的优势中受益,并改善这种建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信