Two Cases of Successful Plasma Exchange with Unfractionated Heparin Anticoagulation in Patients Exhibiting Anaphylaxis to Acid-citrate-dextrose Formula A

Hyein Kang, Do-Hoon Kim, D. Jeon, Wonmok Lee, N. Ryoo, J. Ha
{"title":"Two Cases of Successful Plasma Exchange with Unfractionated Heparin Anticoagulation in Patients Exhibiting Anaphylaxis to Acid-citrate-dextrose Formula A","authors":"Hyein Kang, Do-Hoon Kim, D. Jeon, Wonmok Lee, N. Ryoo, J. Ha","doi":"10.17945/kjbt.2020.31.1.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plasma exchange performed with the aid of acid-citrate-dextrose formula A (ACD-A) is generally regarded as safe. However, unfractionated heparin (UFH) can serve as an anticoagulant for patients experiencing serious side effects such as anaphylaxis. No guidelines have currently been defined for the stand-alone UFH dosing during plasma exchange. We describe here two patients who developed anaphylaxis to ACD-A during plasma exchange, and we successfully used UFH as a standalone anticoagulant. The first patient was a 55-year-old man who required plasma exchange before ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. During plasma exchange, he developed an allergic reaction. Thereafter, UFH was used as a standalone anticoagulant during four sessions of plasma exchange; the UFH (5,000 units) was added to a 500 mL normal saline bag and the UFH:whole blood ratio was maintained at 1:28. The second patient was an 80-year-old woman with steroid pulse-resistant neuromyelitis optica. She developed an allergic reaction during the first session of plasma exchange. The patient subsequently underwent five successful sessions of plasma exchange using UFH as a standalone anticoagulant. These findings may be useful when establishing a protocol for UFH as a standalone anticoagulant during plasma exchange in patients who develop an allergic reaction to citrate. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2020;31:55-60)","PeriodicalId":231122,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17945/kjbt.2020.31.1.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasma exchange performed with the aid of acid-citrate-dextrose formula A (ACD-A) is generally regarded as safe. However, unfractionated heparin (UFH) can serve as an anticoagulant for patients experiencing serious side effects such as anaphylaxis. No guidelines have currently been defined for the stand-alone UFH dosing during plasma exchange. We describe here two patients who developed anaphylaxis to ACD-A during plasma exchange, and we successfully used UFH as a standalone anticoagulant. The first patient was a 55-year-old man who required plasma exchange before ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. During plasma exchange, he developed an allergic reaction. Thereafter, UFH was used as a standalone anticoagulant during four sessions of plasma exchange; the UFH (5,000 units) was added to a 500 mL normal saline bag and the UFH:whole blood ratio was maintained at 1:28. The second patient was an 80-year-old woman with steroid pulse-resistant neuromyelitis optica. She developed an allergic reaction during the first session of plasma exchange. The patient subsequently underwent five successful sessions of plasma exchange using UFH as a standalone anticoagulant. These findings may be useful when establishing a protocol for UFH as a standalone anticoagulant during plasma exchange in patients who develop an allergic reaction to citrate. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2020;31:55-60)
对酸-柠檬酸-葡萄糖配方A过敏反应患者血浆置换无分级肝素抗凝治疗成功2例
用酸-柠檬酸-葡萄糖配方A (ACD-A)进行血浆置换通常被认为是安全的。然而,未分离肝素(UFH)可以作为一种抗凝剂,用于出现严重副作用(如过敏反应)的患者。目前还没有关于血浆交换过程中单独使用UFH剂量的指南。我们在此描述了两例在血浆置换期间对ACD-A发生过敏反应的患者,我们成功地将UFH作为独立的抗凝剂。第一位患者是一名55岁男性,在abo血型不相容的肾移植前需要血浆置换。血浆置换时,他出现了过敏反应。此后,在四次血浆交换中,UFH被用作单独的抗凝剂;500ml生理盐水袋中加入5000单位的UFH,保持UFH与全血的比例为1:28。第二位患者是一位80岁的女性,患有类固醇脉冲抵抗性视神经脊髓炎。她在第一次血浆置换时出现了过敏反应。患者随后接受了5次成功的血浆置换,使用UFH作为单独的抗凝剂。这些发现可能有助于在对柠檬酸盐产生过敏反应的患者血浆置换期间建立UFH作为独立抗凝剂的方案。(韩国输血杂志2020;31:55-60)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信