Estimation methods for the shadow economy. A systematic literature review

Maria - Mihaela Postea, Monica - Violeta Achim
{"title":"Estimation methods for the shadow economy. A systematic literature review","authors":"Maria - Mihaela Postea, Monica - Violeta Achim","doi":"10.34140/bjbv5n3-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimating the shadow economy is by no means a simple task. The hidden nature of the phenomenon makes it difficult to measure. In the literature, there are various methods used in estimating the shadow economy, each of which has its strengths and weaknesses. This paper aims to be a detailed literature review of the different types of methods existing at the current time. The review can be a good reference in deciding which of the methods is best to serve one’s purpose when measuring the underground economy. Analyzing the advantages and shortcomings of each method, as well as the methodology used, can lead to a rational decision regarding the estimation of the shadow economy. Reviewing the literature, we identified three main groups of methods for estimating the shadow economy: 1) Direct methods; 2) Indirect methods; and 3) Model approach. Over the years, there has been an increasing interest in developing estimation models for the shadow economy, but, to date, there is no universally accepted definition for the concept, nor a universally accepted type of model used. However, the most frequently used method to estimate the shadow economy, in recent years has been the model approach (MIMIC), despite its limitations. When deciding which model to use to estimate the shadow economy, one has to consider the definition of the concept (what kinds of activities will be included), the availability of data necessary, and the methodology used. Our paper is useful both for academical purposes but also for policy makers in order to find the best tool of measuring the shadow economy around the world countries.","PeriodicalId":339628,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Business","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv5n3-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimating the shadow economy is by no means a simple task. The hidden nature of the phenomenon makes it difficult to measure. In the literature, there are various methods used in estimating the shadow economy, each of which has its strengths and weaknesses. This paper aims to be a detailed literature review of the different types of methods existing at the current time. The review can be a good reference in deciding which of the methods is best to serve one’s purpose when measuring the underground economy. Analyzing the advantages and shortcomings of each method, as well as the methodology used, can lead to a rational decision regarding the estimation of the shadow economy. Reviewing the literature, we identified three main groups of methods for estimating the shadow economy: 1) Direct methods; 2) Indirect methods; and 3) Model approach. Over the years, there has been an increasing interest in developing estimation models for the shadow economy, but, to date, there is no universally accepted definition for the concept, nor a universally accepted type of model used. However, the most frequently used method to estimate the shadow economy, in recent years has been the model approach (MIMIC), despite its limitations. When deciding which model to use to estimate the shadow economy, one has to consider the definition of the concept (what kinds of activities will be included), the availability of data necessary, and the methodology used. Our paper is useful both for academical purposes but also for policy makers in order to find the best tool of measuring the shadow economy around the world countries.
影子经济的估算方法。系统的文献综述
估计影子经济绝不是一项简单的任务。这种现象的隐蔽性使其难以测量。在文献中,有各种各样的方法用于估算影子经济,每种方法都有其优点和缺点。本文旨在对目前存在的不同类型的方法进行详细的文献综述。在衡量地下经济时,这篇综述可以作为一个很好的参考,来决定哪种方法最能达到人们的目的。分析每种方法的优缺点,以及所使用的方法,可以导致对影子经济的估计的理性决策。回顾文献,我们确定了估计影子经济的三种主要方法:1)直接方法;2)间接法;3)模型法。多年来,人们对开发影子经济的估计模型越来越感兴趣,但是,到目前为止,还没有一个普遍接受的概念定义,也没有一个普遍接受的模型类型。然而,近年来最常用的估计影子经济的方法是模型方法(MIMIC),尽管它有局限性。在决定使用哪种模型来评估影子经济时,必须考虑概念的定义(将包括哪些类型的活动)、必要数据的可用性以及所使用的方法。我们的论文不仅具有学术价值,而且对政策制定者来说也很有用,以便找到衡量世界各国影子经济的最佳工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信