An Analysis of Learners’ Self-Assessments in Comparison With Their Actual Performances in the Subject of Economics

Ilona Esser, Germay Econmics, Kristina Hochreuther, Amelie Reichwald, Katja Sanen, Bjoern Paape, Iwona Kiereta, Christoph Maus
{"title":"An Analysis of Learners’ Self-Assessments in Comparison With Their Actual Performances in the Subject of Economics","authors":"Ilona Esser, Germay Econmics, Kristina Hochreuther, Amelie Reichwald, Katja Sanen, Bjoern Paape, Iwona Kiereta, Christoph Maus","doi":"10.18690/978-961-286-388-3.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares vocational college learners’ selfassessments of their abilities and their performances with their actual examination results. Until now, the ability to self-assess has principally only been addressed in the primary school sector. However, it is of central importance specifically in the vocational college sector, where the focus is on career choice. We hypothesize that 1. Students with a lower level of education self-assess themselves more incorrectly or they overestimate their abili-ties and that 2. Female students self-assess themselves more realistically than male students do. Our hypotheses are tested and confirmed in different vocational colleges and classes. This study, then, is an important first contribution to indicating the risk of an inappropriate career choice particularly for weaker students. Furthermore, our study can provide a starting point for examining whether the focus on support and assistance for female students in their career choices mean that appropriate measures in the planning of school and educational careers for male students have been neglected.","PeriodicalId":137908,"journal":{"name":"39th International Conference on Organizational Science Development","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"39th International Conference on Organizational Science Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-388-3.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares vocational college learners’ selfassessments of their abilities and their performances with their actual examination results. Until now, the ability to self-assess has principally only been addressed in the primary school sector. However, it is of central importance specifically in the vocational college sector, where the focus is on career choice. We hypothesize that 1. Students with a lower level of education self-assess themselves more incorrectly or they overestimate their abili-ties and that 2. Female students self-assess themselves more realistically than male students do. Our hypotheses are tested and confirmed in different vocational colleges and classes. This study, then, is an important first contribution to indicating the risk of an inappropriate career choice particularly for weaker students. Furthermore, our study can provide a starting point for examining whether the focus on support and assistance for female students in their career choices mean that appropriate measures in the planning of school and educational careers for male students have been neglected.
经济学学科学生自我评价与实际表现对比分析
本研究比较了高职院校学生对自身能力和表现的自我评价与实际考试成绩。到目前为止,自我评价的能力主要只在小学部门得到解决。然而,这在职业学院领域尤为重要,因为职业学院的重点是职业选择。我们假设1。2.受教育程度较低的学生自我评估更不正确或高估了自己的能力。女生比男生更现实地自我评价。我们的假设在不同的职业院校和班级中得到了检验和证实。因此,这项研究是一个重要的第一个贡献,它表明了不适当的职业选择的风险,特别是对较弱的学生。此外,我们的研究可以提供一个起点,以检验对女学生职业选择的支持和帮助是否意味着忽视了对男学生的学校和教育职业规划的适当措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信