Investigation of DW Spintronic Memristor performance in 2T1M Neuromorphic Synapse

Yasmin K. Abdelmagid, Renad T. Nawar, Mennatullah K. Rabie, Ahmed S. Tulan, Ahmed H. Hassan, Andoleet Saleh, H. Mostafa
{"title":"Investigation of DW Spintronic Memristor performance in 2T1M Neuromorphic Synapse","authors":"Yasmin K. Abdelmagid, Renad T. Nawar, Mennatullah K. Rabie, Ahmed S. Tulan, Ahmed H. Hassan, Andoleet Saleh, H. Mostafa","doi":"10.1109/NILES50944.2020.9257896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memristor, the two-terminal memory-resistance device discovered by Chua in 1971, is a promising solution for future processing problems. Its CMOS integration compatibility and large resistance in small size, makes it very successful candidate for large-scale systems like Neural Networks. In last decade, memristors were used in many Neuromorphic Synapses for its advantage of combining processing (dot-product) and memory in same device. There are different materials that can be used to fabricate memristors. In this paper, a comparison between spintronic and TiO2-resistive memristor in two-transistors-one memristor synapse, is introduced. The work was done on Cadence Virtuoso with using Verilog-A for memristor modeling. The comparison reveals that the synaptic implementation with a spintronic memristor is more efficient when high speed is needed. However, the resistive memristor is more adequate due to its lower power dissipation.","PeriodicalId":253090,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NILES50944.2020.9257896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Memristor, the two-terminal memory-resistance device discovered by Chua in 1971, is a promising solution for future processing problems. Its CMOS integration compatibility and large resistance in small size, makes it very successful candidate for large-scale systems like Neural Networks. In last decade, memristors were used in many Neuromorphic Synapses for its advantage of combining processing (dot-product) and memory in same device. There are different materials that can be used to fabricate memristors. In this paper, a comparison between spintronic and TiO2-resistive memristor in two-transistors-one memristor synapse, is introduced. The work was done on Cadence Virtuoso with using Verilog-A for memristor modeling. The comparison reveals that the synaptic implementation with a spintronic memristor is more efficient when high speed is needed. However, the resistive memristor is more adequate due to its lower power dissipation.
DW自旋电子忆阻器在2T1M神经形态突触中的性能研究
忆阻器是Chua于1971年发现的双端记忆电阻器件,是解决未来处理问题的一个有希望的解决方案。它具有CMOS集成兼容性和小尺寸的大电阻,使其成为神经网络等大型系统的成功候选者。近十年来,忆阻器以其在同一器件内将处理(点积)和存储相结合的优点,在许多神经形态突触中得到了应用。有不同的材料可用于制造忆阻器。本文介绍了双晶体管-单忆阻突触中自旋电子忆阻器与二氧化钛电阻式忆阻器的比较。这项工作是在Cadence Virtuoso上完成的,使用Verilog-A进行忆阻器建模。比较表明,当需要高速时,使用自旋电子忆阻器的突触实现效率更高。然而,电阻式忆阻器由于其较低的功耗而更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信