Learning Collaboration of Primary Schoolchildren

G. Zuckerman
{"title":"Learning Collaboration of Primary Schoolchildren","authors":"G. Zuckerman","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2021.2034756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question “HOW,” in which modern science specializes, is secondary to the question “WHY.” We have already formulated our opinion: everything at school, including the organization of learning collaboration, should be aimed at educating a person who, once an adult, can independently determine their place in the world of human relations, their own way of thinking and acting, their own POSITION. We differentiate “position” as a relationship that a person constructs to the human world, from “status” and “role.” Status is a characteristic of extremely regimented relationships, in which a person is unambiguously prescribed, in finished form, his or her place, methods of interaction, and system of views and evaluations. Unlike the relationships of position and status that permeate all domains of human existence, “roles” (social and playful) are always partial, do not fully encompass the human “self.” For example, the position (always personal!) of the “believer” is embodied in Luther’s god-building: “Here I stand; I can do no other.” The status of a believer is embodied in the scrupulous Talmudic prescription of every step of a righteous life. And the role of a believer is played by those who, though they attend church on holidays, do not remember God on weekdays. While realizing that we are using “loaded” psychological terms, and not performing here a conceptual analysis and differentiating our understanding of “position,” “status,” and “role” from those accepted in various","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2021.2034756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question “HOW,” in which modern science specializes, is secondary to the question “WHY.” We have already formulated our opinion: everything at school, including the organization of learning collaboration, should be aimed at educating a person who, once an adult, can independently determine their place in the world of human relations, their own way of thinking and acting, their own POSITION. We differentiate “position” as a relationship that a person constructs to the human world, from “status” and “role.” Status is a characteristic of extremely regimented relationships, in which a person is unambiguously prescribed, in finished form, his or her place, methods of interaction, and system of views and evaluations. Unlike the relationships of position and status that permeate all domains of human existence, “roles” (social and playful) are always partial, do not fully encompass the human “self.” For example, the position (always personal!) of the “believer” is embodied in Luther’s god-building: “Here I stand; I can do no other.” The status of a believer is embodied in the scrupulous Talmudic prescription of every step of a righteous life. And the role of a believer is played by those who, though they attend church on holidays, do not remember God on weekdays. While realizing that we are using “loaded” psychological terms, and not performing here a conceptual analysis and differentiating our understanding of “position,” “status,” and “role” from those accepted in various
小学生的学习合作
现代科学专门研究的“如何”问题,次于“为什么”问题。我们已经阐明了我们的观点:学校的一切,包括学习合作的组织,都应旨在教育一个人,使他一旦成年,就能独立决定自己在人际关系世界中的地位,决定自己的思维和行动方式,决定自己的立场。我们将“地位”与“地位”和“角色”区分开来,“地位”是一个人与人类世界建立的关系。地位是一种极其严格的关系的特征,在这种关系中,一个人的位置、互动方式、观点和评价体系都是明确规定的。与渗透到人类存在的所有领域的地位和地位关系不同,“角色”(社会的和好玩的)总是部分的,并不完全包含人类的“自我”。例如,“信徒”的立场(总是个人的!)体现在路德的造神:“我站在这里;我没有别的办法。”信徒的地位体现在《塔木德》对正义生活的每一步的严谨规定中。信徒的角色是由那些虽然在假日去教堂,但在工作日不记得上帝的人扮演的。当我们意识到我们正在使用“负载”的心理学术语时,并没有在这里进行概念分析,并将我们对“位置”,“地位”和“角色”的理解与其他领域所接受的区分开来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信