Conflicts and Coincidences between Views of Ability in Educational Practices and Policies: Discourse on Ability in the late 1950s and 1960s in Japan

Yuki Katayama
{"title":"Conflicts and Coincidences between Views of Ability in Educational Practices and Policies: Discourse on Ability in the late 1950s and 1960s in Japan","authors":"Yuki Katayama","doi":"10.7571/esjkyoiku.16.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper extracts the characteristics of the view of ability in educational practices during the period of rapid growth in Japan, focusing on the influence of these perceptions on the Ministry of Education’s educational policies. The analysis draws on the debate about “vocational aptitude tests” and “observation guidance.” Teachers’ critical perceptions of “vocational aptitude tests” and “observation guidance” depend on their views of desirable ability. The main findings obtained are as follows. Since the 1990s, attention has been focused on non-cognitive ability; a similar view of ability (expansion of the view of ability) can be seen in educational practices in the 1960s. However, this expansion of the view of ability does not only appear in educational practices. According to the analysis of “ability and aptitude, etc.” included in a reference document on observation guidance (presented by MoE, based on the French observation curriculum), an expansion of the view of ability can also be confirmed to be present in educational policy. The view of ability in education al practices may even coincide with that in educational policies.","PeriodicalId":205276,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Japan","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.16.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper extracts the characteristics of the view of ability in educational practices during the period of rapid growth in Japan, focusing on the influence of these perceptions on the Ministry of Education’s educational policies. The analysis draws on the debate about “vocational aptitude tests” and “observation guidance.” Teachers’ critical perceptions of “vocational aptitude tests” and “observation guidance” depend on their views of desirable ability. The main findings obtained are as follows. Since the 1990s, attention has been focused on non-cognitive ability; a similar view of ability (expansion of the view of ability) can be seen in educational practices in the 1960s. However, this expansion of the view of ability does not only appear in educational practices. According to the analysis of “ability and aptitude, etc.” included in a reference document on observation guidance (presented by MoE, based on the French observation curriculum), an expansion of the view of ability can also be confirmed to be present in educational policy. The view of ability in education al practices may even coincide with that in educational policies.
教育实践与政策中能力观的冲突与契合:20世纪50年代末至60年代日本关于能力的论述
本文提取了日本快速增长时期教育实践中能力观的特点,重点分析了这些观念对教育部教育政策的影响。该分析借鉴了关于“职业能力倾向测试”和“观察指导”的争论。教师对“职业能力倾向测试”和“观察指导”的批判性看法取决于他们对理想能力的看法。得到的主要发现如下。自20世纪90年代以来,注意力集中在非认知能力上;在20世纪60年代的教育实践中也可以看到类似的能力观(能力观的扩展)。然而,这种能力观的扩展并不仅仅出现在教育实践中。根据观察指导参考文件(教育部以法国观察课程为基础提出)中对“能力和天赋等”的分析,也可以确认在教育政策中出现了能力观的扩展。教育实践中的能力观甚至可能与教育政策中的能力观相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信