ANALISIS KOMPARASI WIRELESS NETWORK PADA SIMULASI AIRLINK UBIQUITI DENGAN REAL HADWARE UBIQUITI

Ahmad Tantoni, M. T. A. Zaen
{"title":"ANALISIS KOMPARASI WIRELESS NETWORK PADA SIMULASI AIRLINK UBIQUITI DENGAN REAL HADWARE UBIQUITI","authors":"Ahmad Tantoni, M. T. A. Zaen","doi":"10.36595/JIRE.V1I2.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In conducting PtP or PtMP wireless signals, a simulation is needed with a design to determine the height of the tower and see the height of the surrounding buildings from the Access Point (site A) and Station (site B) to avoid the Line of Sight (LOS) and Fresnel Zone. Not only that, in designing the rt/rw.net network, it is also necessary to select devices and network simulation in order to estimate the results of the desired network performance and how much it costs. Problems occur when the network hardware has been installed and pointed from Site A to Site B to get unsatisfactory results according to previous simulations. \nThis study is to determine the accuracy of the results of the ubiquiti simulation performance with the real hardware network Ubiquitous products. This is done because when sometimes simulateds, the expected results do not match the real estate. The research methodology used by PPDIOO Method is made by Cisco. \nResearch at Brembuk.net Pancor, East Lombok with comparative analysis of wireless networks using simulation airlink.com ubiquiti and real hardware network ubiquitous products, carried out from site A to site B with a distance of approximately 1.47 kilometers. From the RX signal strength in the simulation is better than when using real hardware because the simulation produces a signal of -37.80 dBm while in the real hardware produces the signal -41.00 dBm. The total capacity of download & upload in real hardware is better than when using simulation because in real hardware it produces 137.54 Mbps while in simulation it produces 121.10 Mbps performance, and between airlink.ubnt.com using ubiquiti simulation and real hardware network ubiquiti products almost get the same results.","PeriodicalId":367275,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Elektronik","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Elektronik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36595/JIRE.V1I2.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In conducting PtP or PtMP wireless signals, a simulation is needed with a design to determine the height of the tower and see the height of the surrounding buildings from the Access Point (site A) and Station (site B) to avoid the Line of Sight (LOS) and Fresnel Zone. Not only that, in designing the rt/rw.net network, it is also necessary to select devices and network simulation in order to estimate the results of the desired network performance and how much it costs. Problems occur when the network hardware has been installed and pointed from Site A to Site B to get unsatisfactory results according to previous simulations. This study is to determine the accuracy of the results of the ubiquiti simulation performance with the real hardware network Ubiquitous products. This is done because when sometimes simulateds, the expected results do not match the real estate. The research methodology used by PPDIOO Method is made by Cisco. Research at Brembuk.net Pancor, East Lombok with comparative analysis of wireless networks using simulation airlink.com ubiquiti and real hardware network ubiquitous products, carried out from site A to site B with a distance of approximately 1.47 kilometers. From the RX signal strength in the simulation is better than when using real hardware because the simulation produces a signal of -37.80 dBm while in the real hardware produces the signal -41.00 dBm. The total capacity of download & upload in real hardware is better than when using simulation because in real hardware it produces 137.54 Mbps while in simulation it produces 121.10 Mbps performance, and between airlink.ubnt.com using ubiquiti simulation and real hardware network ubiquiti products almost get the same results.
在进行PtP或PtMP无线信号时,需要进行模拟设计,以确定塔的高度,并从接入点(站点a)和站点(站点B)看到周围建筑物的高度,以避免视线(LOS)和菲涅耳区。不仅如此,在设计rt/rw.net网络时,还需要对设备进行选择和网络仿真,以估计所期望的网络性能结果和成本。当网络硬件安装完毕,从A点指向B点时,问题出现了,根据之前的模拟,结果并不理想。本研究旨在确定泛在仿真结果与真实硬件网络产品泛在性能的准确性。这样做是因为有时在模拟时,预期的结果与实际情况不匹配。PPDIOO方法所使用的研究方法是由Cisco公司制定的。研究在东龙目岛的Brembuk.net Pancor,使用模拟airlink.com ubiquiti和真实硬件网络无处不在产品的无线网络进行比较分析,从站点A到站点B的距离约为1.47公里。从RX信号强度在仿真中比在使用真实硬件时要好,因为仿真产生的信号为-37.80 dBm,而在真实硬件中产生的信号为-41.00 dBm。实际硬件下的下载和上传总容量比仿真时的性能要好,实际硬件下的性能为137.54 Mbps,仿真时的性能为121.10 Mbps,使用ubiquiti仿真的airlink.ubnt.com与实际硬件网络中ubiquiti产品的性能几乎相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信