The knowledge-rich project, coloniality, and the preservation of whiteness in schools: a raciolinguistic perspective

I. Cushing
{"title":"The knowledge-rich project, coloniality, and the preservation of whiteness in schools: a raciolinguistic perspective","authors":"I. Cushing","doi":"10.1515/eduling-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the early 2010s, education policy in England has been shaped by so-called knowledge-rich ideologies of curriculum design, built around a purportedly essential body of knowledge which all children must be taught if they are to succeed in school and experience upward social mobility. The knowledge-rich project is underpinned by a colonial, missionary and conservative narrative that the homes of working class and racially marginalised families are illiterate, degenerate, and symptomatic of cultural, linguistic, and cognitive deficit – and these defects must be compensated for through Western-centric curricula. In this article I adopt a raciolinguistic perspective to trace the colonial histories of the knowledge-rich project and its emergence as a political and academic agenda in the 1980s. I argue that the knowledge-rich project is actively designed to sustain white supremacy through the systematic discrediting and annihilation of language practices of racially marginalised children, particularly those racialised as Black. I show how raciolinguistic ideologies are integral to the knowledge-rich project, circulating through racist perceptions about language and society which frame racialised children as displaying linguistic inadequacies which carry a threat to social and national cohesion.","PeriodicalId":153620,"journal":{"name":"Educational Linguistics","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eduling-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Since the early 2010s, education policy in England has been shaped by so-called knowledge-rich ideologies of curriculum design, built around a purportedly essential body of knowledge which all children must be taught if they are to succeed in school and experience upward social mobility. The knowledge-rich project is underpinned by a colonial, missionary and conservative narrative that the homes of working class and racially marginalised families are illiterate, degenerate, and symptomatic of cultural, linguistic, and cognitive deficit – and these defects must be compensated for through Western-centric curricula. In this article I adopt a raciolinguistic perspective to trace the colonial histories of the knowledge-rich project and its emergence as a political and academic agenda in the 1980s. I argue that the knowledge-rich project is actively designed to sustain white supremacy through the systematic discrediting and annihilation of language practices of racially marginalised children, particularly those racialised as Black. I show how raciolinguistic ideologies are integral to the knowledge-rich project, circulating through racist perceptions about language and society which frame racialised children as displaying linguistic inadequacies which carry a threat to social and national cohesion.
知识丰富的计划、殖民主义和学校中白人的保留:一个种族语言学的视角
自2010年代初以来,英国的教育政策一直受到所谓的知识丰富的课程设计意识形态的影响,这些课程设计围绕着所谓的基本知识体系而建立,如果所有孩子要在学校取得成功并经历向上的社会流动,就必须教授这些知识体系。这个知识丰富的项目是由殖民、传教和保守的叙事支撑的,工人阶级和种族边缘化家庭的家庭是文盲、堕落的,是文化、语言和认知缺陷的症状——这些缺陷必须通过以西方为中心的课程来弥补。在这篇文章中,我采用了一个种族语言学的视角来追溯这个知识丰富项目的殖民历史,以及它在20世纪80年代作为一个政治和学术议程的出现。我认为,这个知识丰富的项目被积极地设计成通过系统性地诋毁和消灭种族边缘化儿童的语言实践来维持白人至上,尤其是那些被种族化为黑人的儿童。我展示了种族语言意识形态是知识丰富的项目的组成部分,通过对语言和社会的种族主义观念传播,这些观念将种族化的儿童视为语言缺陷,对社会和民族凝聚力构成威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信