The effect of mandatory adoption of IFRS on the magnitude of accruals

Francisco Sánchez, B. Giner, Belén Gill-de-Albornoz Noguer
{"title":"The effect of mandatory adoption of IFRS on the magnitude of accruals","authors":"Francisco Sánchez, B. Giner, Belén Gill-de-Albornoz Noguer","doi":"10.1108/arla-01-2021-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper investigates whether the greater flexibility of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in contrast to accounting models that were used before those standards became mandatory meant a significant change in the magnitude of accruals recognized in the accounting income.Design/methodology/approach18,126 observations are analyzed on 1,881 non-financial companies in 19 European countries in 2000–2012. A difference-in-differences regression method is used. The treatment sample includes companies that were required to adopt IFRS as from the 2005 fiscal year, while the control sample comprises companies that voluntarily adopted IFRS prior to 2005.FindingsCompared to prior accounting standards, the mandatory adoption of IFRS increased the absolute value of accruals. This result is seen only in those companies where the magnitude of accruals is negative. The observed effect is independent of the degree of similarity between IFRS and prior standards.Originality/valueThis paper complements the literature analyzing the effect of IFRS on the financial statements and on the financial-economic indicators of companies. It analyzes the component of accounting income that is most sensitive to the use of professional judgment: accruals. Focusing on observed accruals helps avoid an error in measurement that can be made when working with the discretionary component of accruals. Additionally, a longer time horizon than in previous studies is considered.","PeriodicalId":387315,"journal":{"name":"Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración","volume":"217 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-01-2021-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper investigates whether the greater flexibility of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in contrast to accounting models that were used before those standards became mandatory meant a significant change in the magnitude of accruals recognized in the accounting income.Design/methodology/approach18,126 observations are analyzed on 1,881 non-financial companies in 19 European countries in 2000–2012. A difference-in-differences regression method is used. The treatment sample includes companies that were required to adopt IFRS as from the 2005 fiscal year, while the control sample comprises companies that voluntarily adopted IFRS prior to 2005.FindingsCompared to prior accounting standards, the mandatory adoption of IFRS increased the absolute value of accruals. This result is seen only in those companies where the magnitude of accruals is negative. The observed effect is independent of the degree of similarity between IFRS and prior standards.Originality/valueThis paper complements the literature analyzing the effect of IFRS on the financial statements and on the financial-economic indicators of companies. It analyzes the component of accounting income that is most sensitive to the use of professional judgment: accruals. Focusing on observed accruals helps avoid an error in measurement that can be made when working with the discretionary component of accruals. Additionally, a longer time horizon than in previous studies is considered.
强制性采用国际财务报告准则对应计项目规模的影响
目的:本文研究国际财务报告准则(IFRS)与在这些准则成为强制性之前使用的会计模型相比,更大的灵活性是否意味着会计收入中确认的应计项目的规模发生了重大变化。设计/方法/方法在2000-2012年对19个欧洲国家的1881家非金融公司进行了18126次观察分析。采用差中差回归方法。处理样本包括从2005财年开始被要求采用国际财务报告准则的公司,而控制样本包括在2005年之前自愿采用国际财务报告准则的公司。与以前的会计准则相比,强制性采用国际财务报告准则增加了应计项目的绝对值。这种结果只出现在应计金额为负的公司。所观察到的影响与国际财务报告准则与先前准则之间的相似程度无关。原创性/价值本文补充了分析国际财务报告准则对财务报表和公司财务经济指标影响的文献。它分析了会计收益中对专业判断使用最敏感的部分:应计项目。关注观察到的应计项目有助于避免在处理应计项目的可自由支配成分时可能产生的计量误差。此外,考虑了比以往研究更长的时间范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信