{"title":"Synonymy in Arabic: Illusion and Reality","authors":"Ahmadifar Ali","doi":"10.54848/bjtll.v2i1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the phenomenon of synonymity in natural languages, with a special reference to Arabic. In addition, it explicates the views of both ancient and modern linguists and philologists concerning such a phenomenon. Some of them, like Fakhr Al-Dīn Al-Razī (d. 478/1085), Al-Zajjāj (d. 310/922) and Al-Fayrūzabadī (d. 817/1415), argue for the existence of synonymy, and others, like Abū Helāl Al-‘Askarī (d. 395/1005), Ahmad ibn Faris (d. 395/1004) and Al-Tha’ālebī (d. 429/1038), reject the existence of synonymy. Obviously, the phenomenon of synonymity divided linguists and scholars into two groups, namely proponents, who defended synonymy and argued for its occurrence in languages, in general, on one hand, and opponents, who denied its existence in general, and in the Holy Qur?ān in particular, like Al-Khattabī (d. 388/988) and Bint Al-Shāti? (d. 1419/1998), on the other hand.","PeriodicalId":241858,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Translation, Linguistics and Literature","volume":"436 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Translation, Linguistics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54848/bjtll.v2i1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper investigates the phenomenon of synonymity in natural languages, with a special reference to Arabic. In addition, it explicates the views of both ancient and modern linguists and philologists concerning such a phenomenon. Some of them, like Fakhr Al-Dīn Al-Razī (d. 478/1085), Al-Zajjāj (d. 310/922) and Al-Fayrūzabadī (d. 817/1415), argue for the existence of synonymy, and others, like Abū Helāl Al-‘Askarī (d. 395/1005), Ahmad ibn Faris (d. 395/1004) and Al-Tha’ālebī (d. 429/1038), reject the existence of synonymy. Obviously, the phenomenon of synonymity divided linguists and scholars into two groups, namely proponents, who defended synonymy and argued for its occurrence in languages, in general, on one hand, and opponents, who denied its existence in general, and in the Holy Qur?ān in particular, like Al-Khattabī (d. 388/988) and Bint Al-Shāti? (d. 1419/1998), on the other hand.
本文以阿拉伯语为研究对象,探讨了自然语言中的同义现象。此外,本文还阐述了古今语言学家和文献学家对这一现象的看法。其中一些人,如Fakhr Al- d n Al- razyi(478/1085年),Al-Zajjāj(310/922年)和Al-Fayrūzabadī(817/1415年),主张同义词的存在,而其他人,如abyHelāl Al- askaryi(395/1005年),Ahmad ibn Faris(395/1004年)和Al- tha ' ālebī(429/1038年),则拒绝同义词的存在。很明显,同义现象把语言学家和学者分成了两派,一派是支持同义的人,他们为同义在语言中普遍存在辩护,认为同义在语言中普遍存在;另一派是反对同义的人,他们普遍否认同义的存在,并在《古兰经》中否认同义的存在。特别是ān,像al - khattab (d. 388/988)和Bint Al-Shāti?(d. 1419/1998)。