Application Of Acquit Et De Charge In Removal Of Liability Of The Board Of Directors Of A Limited Company

Lu Sudirman
{"title":"Application Of Acquit Et De Charge In Removal Of Liability Of The Board Of Directors Of A Limited Company","authors":"Lu Sudirman","doi":"10.31328/wy.v6i1.4000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Indonesian people demand the form of a Limited Liability Company because of legal certainty in the form of limited liability, providing convenience for the owner (shareholder) to transfer his company by selling all the shares he owns in the company. Where there is a clear separation between ownership and management (power); therefore, to be able to run the company, there is management called the Company Organ, and it is divided into 3 (three) parts: the Board of Directors, the Board of Commissioners, and the General Meeting of Shareholders. The Board of Directors has dominant authority in the management and representation of the company inside and outside the court. With great authority, there is also significant risk. The Board of Directors is very vulnerable to being sued and prosecuted in court; this condition makes the Board of Directors worry about taking steps. The doctrine of acquit et de charge, which is implicit in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (Perseroan Terbatas/PT), still does not provide adequate protection for the personnel of the Board of Directors. This study aims to describe legal certainty in the application of acquit et de charge as an effort to protect the Company's Board of Directors. This research is descriptive of the type of juridical-normative research. The type of approach used is the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. However, in reality, there is no legal certainty in Indonesia applying to acquit et de charge.","PeriodicalId":106813,"journal":{"name":"Widya Yuridika","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widya Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i1.4000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Indonesian people demand the form of a Limited Liability Company because of legal certainty in the form of limited liability, providing convenience for the owner (shareholder) to transfer his company by selling all the shares he owns in the company. Where there is a clear separation between ownership and management (power); therefore, to be able to run the company, there is management called the Company Organ, and it is divided into 3 (three) parts: the Board of Directors, the Board of Commissioners, and the General Meeting of Shareholders. The Board of Directors has dominant authority in the management and representation of the company inside and outside the court. With great authority, there is also significant risk. The Board of Directors is very vulnerable to being sued and prosecuted in court; this condition makes the Board of Directors worry about taking steps. The doctrine of acquit et de charge, which is implicit in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (Perseroan Terbatas/PT), still does not provide adequate protection for the personnel of the Board of Directors. This study aims to describe legal certainty in the application of acquit et de charge as an effort to protect the Company's Board of Directors. This research is descriptive of the type of juridical-normative research. The type of approach used is the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. However, in reality, there is no legal certainty in Indonesia applying to acquit et de charge.
在有限公司董事会免除责任中不起诉不起诉的适用
印尼人民要求有限责任公司的形式是因为有限责任公司形式的法律确定性,为所有者(股东)通过出售其在公司的所有股份来转让公司提供便利。在所有权和经营权(权力)之间有明确的分离;因此,为了能够经营公司,有一个被称为公司机构的管理机构,它分为3个部分:董事会、董事会和股东大会。董事会在法院内外对公司的管理和代表具有主导权力。拥有巨大的权力,也有很大的风险。董事会很容易被起诉和起诉;这种情况使董事会担心采取措施。2007年关于有限责任公司(perseran Terbatas/PT)的第40号法律中隐含的无罪推定原则仍然没有为董事会人员提供足够的保护。本研究旨在描述不判无罪的法律确定性,以保护公司董事会。本研究是对司法规范研究类型的描述。所使用的方法类型是法定方法和概念方法。然而,在现实中,在印度尼西亚,不存在适用无罪推定的法律确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信