Effects of Data Structure in Convolutional Neural Network for Detection of Asynchronous Breathing in Mechanical Ventilation Treatment

Christopher Yew Shuen Ang, N. L. Loo, Y. Chiew, C. P. Tan, M. Nor, J. Chase
{"title":"Effects of Data Structure in Convolutional Neural Network for Detection of Asynchronous Breathing in Mechanical Ventilation Treatment","authors":"Christopher Yew Shuen Ang, N. L. Loo, Y. Chiew, C. P. Tan, M. Nor, J. Chase","doi":"10.1109/IECBES54088.2022.10079652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asynchronous breathing (AB) in mechanical ventilation (MV) patients is heterogenous, patient-specific, and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Various machine learning models have been developed for AB detection, however studies regarding the data structures used for model training are scarce. This study investigates the effects of different training data structures and sizes of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to detect AB. Four CNN models were developed using different amounts of data and data structures: one-dimension, line, area, and array. Training datasets consisting of 300, 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 airway pressure waveforms from MV patients were used for model development. Model sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using an independent set of 3000 waveforms in a 100-iteration Monte-Carlo analysis. The best-performing CNN model was used to determine Asynchrony Index (AI) values in a clinical patient cohort. Monte-Carlo analysis showed that models trained with datasets of 10,000 breathing cycles delivered $\\gt99$% sensitivity and specificity. Relatively lower sensitivity and specificity of $\\lt78.8$% and $\\lt96.7$% respectively were obtained when trained with data quantities of 5000 breaths or less. A CNN trained with 1Dimensional data structure yielded 99.9% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity. It achieved 88.5% average accuracy when validated with an independent clinical data set of 544,319 breaths. Asynchrony breathing detection is ubiquitous and 1-Dimensional data structures provide a resource efficient method for the development of an accurate CNN model.","PeriodicalId":146681,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IECBES54088.2022.10079652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asynchronous breathing (AB) in mechanical ventilation (MV) patients is heterogenous, patient-specific, and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Various machine learning models have been developed for AB detection, however studies regarding the data structures used for model training are scarce. This study investigates the effects of different training data structures and sizes of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to detect AB. Four CNN models were developed using different amounts of data and data structures: one-dimension, line, area, and array. Training datasets consisting of 300, 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 airway pressure waveforms from MV patients were used for model development. Model sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using an independent set of 3000 waveforms in a 100-iteration Monte-Carlo analysis. The best-performing CNN model was used to determine Asynchrony Index (AI) values in a clinical patient cohort. Monte-Carlo analysis showed that models trained with datasets of 10,000 breathing cycles delivered $\gt99$% sensitivity and specificity. Relatively lower sensitivity and specificity of $\lt78.8$% and $\lt96.7$% respectively were obtained when trained with data quantities of 5000 breaths or less. A CNN trained with 1Dimensional data structure yielded 99.9% sensitivity and 99.6% specificity. It achieved 88.5% average accuracy when validated with an independent clinical data set of 544,319 breaths. Asynchrony breathing detection is ubiquitous and 1-Dimensional data structures provide a resource efficient method for the development of an accurate CNN model.
卷积神经网络数据结构在机械通气治疗中异步呼吸检测中的作用
机械通气(MV)患者的异步呼吸(AB)是异质性的,患者特异性的,并且与不良患者结局相关。已经开发了用于AB检测的各种机器学习模型,但是关于用于模型训练的数据结构的研究很少。本研究探讨了不同训练数据结构和大小对卷积神经网络(CNN)检测AB的影响。使用不同的数据量和数据结构:一维、线、面积和数组,开发了四种卷积神经网络模型。由来自MV患者的300、1,000、5,000和10,000个气道压力波形组成的训练数据集用于模型开发。在100次迭代的蒙特卡罗分析中,使用一组独立的3000个波形来评估模型的灵敏度和特异性。使用表现最好的CNN模型来确定临床患者队列中的异步指数(AI)值。蒙特卡罗分析显示,使用10,000个呼吸周期数据集训练的模型具有$ $ gt99$%的灵敏度和特异性。当数据量为5000次或更少呼吸时,获得的灵敏度和特异性相对较低,分别为$\ lt78.8%和$\lt96.7$%。用一维数据结构训练的CNN灵敏度为99.9%,特异度为99.6%。当使用独立的临床数据集544,319次呼吸进行验证时,其平均准确率达到88.5%。异步呼吸检测无处不在,一维数据结构为开发准确的CNN模型提供了一种资源高效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信