Incorporating Range Anxiety into Electric Vehicle Highway Charging Decisions: A Bayesian Game Analysis✱

Huanyu Yan, Xiaoying Tang
{"title":"Incorporating Range Anxiety into Electric Vehicle Highway Charging Decisions: A Bayesian Game Analysis✱","authors":"Huanyu Yan, Xiaoying Tang","doi":"10.1145/3575813.3595195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the penetration of electric vehicles (EVs) increases, highway charging has become an increasing concern for EV drivers. The improvement of EV highway charging requires analysis of EV drivers’ charging decisions. However, range anxiety, the fear of running out of electricity before reaching the next charging station, is mostly ignored by literature studying EV charging behaviors on highways. In this paper, the impact of EV drivers’ subjective range anxiety on highway charging is explicitly accounted for. In particular, a non-cooperative Bayes game is formulated between EV drivers in which each driver decides whether to charge. In this game, EV drivers seek to minimize costs, including the charging fee, range anxiety, and queuing time. A novel approach based on Prospect Theory is proposed to incorporate the impact of EV drivers’ range anxiety on charging decisions. To analyze the game insights, we prove the existence and uniqueness of Bayes Nash Equilibrium (BNE) in the symmetric two-player case, and propose an algorithm to solve the BNE. Numerical experiments are conducted to illustrate the effect of range anxiety on charging decisions. In particular, the charging decisions depend significantly on the drivers’ risk aversion tendencies.","PeriodicalId":359352,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems","volume":"380 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3575813.3595195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the penetration of electric vehicles (EVs) increases, highway charging has become an increasing concern for EV drivers. The improvement of EV highway charging requires analysis of EV drivers’ charging decisions. However, range anxiety, the fear of running out of electricity before reaching the next charging station, is mostly ignored by literature studying EV charging behaviors on highways. In this paper, the impact of EV drivers’ subjective range anxiety on highway charging is explicitly accounted for. In particular, a non-cooperative Bayes game is formulated between EV drivers in which each driver decides whether to charge. In this game, EV drivers seek to minimize costs, including the charging fee, range anxiety, and queuing time. A novel approach based on Prospect Theory is proposed to incorporate the impact of EV drivers’ range anxiety on charging decisions. To analyze the game insights, we prove the existence and uniqueness of Bayes Nash Equilibrium (BNE) in the symmetric two-player case, and propose an algorithm to solve the BNE. Numerical experiments are conducted to illustrate the effect of range anxiety on charging decisions. In particular, the charging decisions depend significantly on the drivers’ risk aversion tendencies.
将里程焦虑纳入电动汽车高速公路充电决策:一个贝叶斯博弈分析
随着电动汽车普及率的提高,高速公路充电问题越来越受到电动汽车司机的关注。电动汽车高速公路充电的改进需要对电动汽车驾驶员的充电决策进行分析。然而,研究电动汽车在高速公路上充电行为的文献大多忽略了里程焦虑,即担心在到达下一个充电站之前电量耗尽。本文明确考虑了电动汽车驾驶员主观里程焦虑对高速公路充电的影响。特别地,在电动汽车司机之间建立了一个由每个司机决定是否充电的非合作贝叶斯博弈。在这个博弈中,电动汽车司机寻求最小化成本,包括充电费用、里程焦虑和排队时间。提出了一种基于前景理论的新方法来考虑电动汽车驾驶员里程焦虑对充电决策的影响。为了分析博弈洞见,我们证明了对称双参与者情况下贝叶斯纳什均衡(BNE)的存在唯一性,并提出了一种求解BNE的算法。通过数值实验验证了里程焦虑对充电决策的影响。特别是,收费决策显著依赖于驾驶员的风险规避倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信