MANIFESTATION OF THANATOS IN EDWARD BOND’S SAVED

Mostafa A. S. Rosheed, Ahmed H. UBEID
{"title":"MANIFESTATION OF THANATOS IN EDWARD BOND’S SAVED","authors":"Mostafa A. S. Rosheed, Ahmed H. UBEID","doi":"10.47832/2757-5403.18.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the post-Freudian thought, the two driving forces of human beings are Eros and Thanatos. They are the pleasure principle and death drive, respectively. The derivative terminology of these two forces is originated in Greek mythology with Eros as the god of pleasure and Thanatos, on the other hand, as the personification of death. For a long time, the latter force was eliminated off-stage due to theatrical existential reasons. However, one of the few successful attempts to force Thanatos on-stage is detected in Edward Bond‘s Saved (1968). This paper approaches Bond‘s Saved (1968) aiming to show the poeticity in the Shklovskian defamiliarizing entries that forced the theatrical censorship into accepting the play despite the fact that the play promptly violated the censorship regulations. With these entries, the stage—once again—addresses human feelings while reshaping the Eros-oriented theatre. The result is residing tension in the audience after realizing the unexplored possibilities of the Thanatos-oriented stage and a consequent undoing of the prior anchorage of metaphor into a floating concept that involves the redefinition attempts into same-but-different perspective. The findings of the paper implicate that the employment of irregular techniques makes it possible to challenge people into the recognition of corruption by being charged with the responsibility of taking action concerning paratextual contexts through nondidactic plays.","PeriodicalId":182370,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.18.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the post-Freudian thought, the two driving forces of human beings are Eros and Thanatos. They are the pleasure principle and death drive, respectively. The derivative terminology of these two forces is originated in Greek mythology with Eros as the god of pleasure and Thanatos, on the other hand, as the personification of death. For a long time, the latter force was eliminated off-stage due to theatrical existential reasons. However, one of the few successful attempts to force Thanatos on-stage is detected in Edward Bond‘s Saved (1968). This paper approaches Bond‘s Saved (1968) aiming to show the poeticity in the Shklovskian defamiliarizing entries that forced the theatrical censorship into accepting the play despite the fact that the play promptly violated the censorship regulations. With these entries, the stage—once again—addresses human feelings while reshaping the Eros-oriented theatre. The result is residing tension in the audience after realizing the unexplored possibilities of the Thanatos-oriented stage and a consequent undoing of the prior anchorage of metaphor into a floating concept that involves the redefinition attempts into same-but-different perspective. The findings of the paper implicate that the employment of irregular techniques makes it possible to challenge people into the recognition of corruption by being charged with the responsibility of taking action concerning paratextual contexts through nondidactic plays.
在爱德华·邦德的拯救中死神的显现
在后弗洛伊德思想中,人类的两种驱动力是爱神和塔纳托斯。它们分别是快乐原则和死亡驱动。这两种力量的衍生术语起源于希腊神话,另一方面,厄洛斯是快乐之神,塔纳托斯是死亡的化身。长期以来,由于戏剧存在的原因,后者在舞台下被淘汰。然而,在爱德华·邦德的《拯救》(1968)中,有几次成功迫使塔纳托斯上台的尝试。本文以《邦德的拯救》(1968)为研究对象,旨在揭示施克洛夫斯基式的陌生感条目中的诗意,这种诗意迫使戏剧审查机构接受了这部戏剧,尽管它很快就违反了审查规定。有了这些作品,舞台在重塑以eros为导向的剧院的同时,再次表达了人类的情感。其结果是观众在意识到以thanatos为导向的舞台未被探索的可能性后,在意识到隐喻的先前锚定被解除为一个浮动的概念后,在同一但不同的角度进行重新定义的尝试。本文的研究结果表明,非常规技术的使用使得人们有可能通过非说教性的戏剧来承担对准文本语境采取行动的责任,从而挑战人们对腐败的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信