{"title":"Field studies of shell regrowth as a bioindicator of eastern oyster ( Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) response to 2,4-D BEE in Maryland tidewaters","authors":"C. K. Rawls","doi":"10.2307/1350800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New growth was filed from eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) shells and wire trays holding 25 oysters each were exposed to the butoxyethanol ester of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D BEE) at rates of either 22.5, 33.75 or 67.5 kg ae (acid equivalent)/h (20, 30 or 60 Ib ae/acre). Regenerated shell growth was measured to determine the effect of herbicide application on the oyster. Two sites were used; a double-pond area with narrow inlet and outlet, and an open bay. Plant control was noted. Under the conditions of the study, oyster shell regrowth or replacement did not reflect adverse reactions to the level of herbicide applied. It appears that 2,4-D BEE in Maryland probably can be used safely to clear oyster beds of eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) prior to fall oyster harvest.","PeriodicalId":106819,"journal":{"name":"Chesapeake Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chesapeake Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1350800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
New growth was filed from eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) shells and wire trays holding 25 oysters each were exposed to the butoxyethanol ester of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D BEE) at rates of either 22.5, 33.75 or 67.5 kg ae (acid equivalent)/h (20, 30 or 60 Ib ae/acre). Regenerated shell growth was measured to determine the effect of herbicide application on the oyster. Two sites were used; a double-pond area with narrow inlet and outlet, and an open bay. Plant control was noted. Under the conditions of the study, oyster shell regrowth or replacement did not reflect adverse reactions to the level of herbicide applied. It appears that 2,4-D BEE in Maryland probably can be used safely to clear oyster beds of eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) prior to fall oyster harvest.
马里兰州潮汐水域东部牡蛎(Crassostrea virginica Gmelin)对2,4- d BEE响应的贝壳再生生物指标的野外研究
从东部牡蛎(Crassostrea virginica Gmelin)的壳中培育新生长的牡蛎,并将每只牡蛎盛有25只的金属丝托盘暴露于2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4- d BEE)的丁氧乙醇酯中,以22.5、33.75或67.5千克/小时(酸当量)(20、30或60千克/英亩)的速率进行处理。通过测定再生壳的生长情况,确定除草剂对牡蛎的影响。使用了两个地点;一个双池塘区域,有狭窄的入口和出口,以及一个开放的海湾。注意到植物控制。在本研究条件下,牡蛎壳的再生或替换没有反映除草剂施用水平的不良反应。看来,在马里兰州,2,4- d BEE可能可以安全地用于在秋季牡蛎收获前清除欧亚水藻(Myriophyllum spicatum L.)牡蛎床。