On estimation of temporal fuzzy sets for signal analysis: FCM vs. FMLE approaches

B. Kosanovic, L. Chaparro, R. Sclabassi
{"title":"On estimation of temporal fuzzy sets for signal analysis: FCM vs. FMLE approaches","authors":"B. Kosanovic, L. Chaparro, R. Sclabassi","doi":"10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimation of temporal fuzzy sets that model dynamic processes is discussed. It has been found that although poles of attraction can be estimated fairly well with different fuzzy partitioning algorithms, membership function estimates may fail in accurately describing dynamic changes within the observed signals. Two types of fuzzy partitioning algorithms are compared: fuzzy c-means (FCM) and fuzzy maximum likelihood (FMLE). The simulations performed on quasi stationary Gaussian signals suggest that the membership functions estimated by FMLE fail to follow continuous changes of dynamics, while those estimated by FCM provide a good compromise between precision and physical relevance.","PeriodicalId":298915,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Estimation of temporal fuzzy sets that model dynamic processes is discussed. It has been found that although poles of attraction can be estimated fairly well with different fuzzy partitioning algorithms, membership function estimates may fail in accurately describing dynamic changes within the observed signals. Two types of fuzzy partitioning algorithms are compared: fuzzy c-means (FCM) and fuzzy maximum likelihood (FMLE). The simulations performed on quasi stationary Gaussian signals suggest that the membership functions estimated by FMLE fail to follow continuous changes of dynamics, while those estimated by FCM provide a good compromise between precision and physical relevance.
信号分析中时间模糊集的估计:FCM与FMLE方法
讨论了模拟动态过程的时间模糊集的估计。研究发现,尽管用不同的模糊划分算法可以很好地估计引力极,但隶属函数估计可能无法准确描述观测信号内的动态变化。比较了两种模糊划分算法:模糊c均值(FCM)和模糊最大似然(FMLE)。对准平稳高斯信号的仿真表明,FMLE估计的隶属函数不能跟随动态的连续变化,而FCM估计的隶属函数在精度和物理相关性之间提供了很好的折衷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信