Phylogenetic Consensus for Exact Median Trees

Pawel Tabaszewski, P. Górecki, O. Eulenstein
{"title":"Phylogenetic Consensus for Exact Median Trees","authors":"Pawel Tabaszewski, P. Górecki, O. Eulenstein","doi":"10.1145/3233547.3233560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solving median tree problems is a classic approach for inferring species trees from a collection of discordant gene trees. Such problems are typically NP-hard and dealt with by local search heuristics. Unfortunately, such heuristics generally lack any provable correctness and precision. Algorithmic advances addressing this uncertainty, have led to exact dynamic programming formulations suitable to solve a well-studied group of median tree problems for smaller phylogenetic analyzes. However, these formulations allow to compute only very few optimal species trees out of possibly many such trees, and phylogenetic studies often require the analysis of all optimal solutions through their consensus tree. Here, we describe a significant algorithmic modification of the dynamic programming formulations that compute the cluster counts of all optimal species trees from which various types of consensus trees can be efficiently computed. Through experimental studies, we demonstrate that our parallel implementation of the modified programming formulation is more efficient than a previous implementation of the original formulation, and can greatly benefit phylogenetic analyses.","PeriodicalId":131906,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3233547.3233560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Solving median tree problems is a classic approach for inferring species trees from a collection of discordant gene trees. Such problems are typically NP-hard and dealt with by local search heuristics. Unfortunately, such heuristics generally lack any provable correctness and precision. Algorithmic advances addressing this uncertainty, have led to exact dynamic programming formulations suitable to solve a well-studied group of median tree problems for smaller phylogenetic analyzes. However, these formulations allow to compute only very few optimal species trees out of possibly many such trees, and phylogenetic studies often require the analysis of all optimal solutions through their consensus tree. Here, we describe a significant algorithmic modification of the dynamic programming formulations that compute the cluster counts of all optimal species trees from which various types of consensus trees can be efficiently computed. Through experimental studies, we demonstrate that our parallel implementation of the modified programming formulation is more efficient than a previous implementation of the original formulation, and can greatly benefit phylogenetic analyses.
精确中位数树的系统发育一致性
求解中值树问题是从一组不一致的基因树中推断物种树的经典方法。这类问题通常是np困难的,并通过局部搜索启发式来处理。不幸的是,这种启发式通常缺乏任何可证明的正确性和准确性。算法的进步解决了这种不确定性,产生了精确的动态规划公式,适用于解决一组研究得很好的中位数树问题,用于较小的系统发育分析。然而,这些公式只允许在可能的许多这样的树中计算很少的最优物种树,并且系统发育研究通常需要通过它们的共识树分析所有最优解。在这里,我们描述了动态规划公式的一个重要的算法修改,该公式计算所有最优物种树的簇计数,从中可以有效地计算各种类型的共识树。通过实验研究,我们证明了我们改进的规划公式的并行实现比原始公式的先前实现更有效,并且可以极大地有利于系统发育分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信