«Chelovekoznaniye» (Knowledge of Man) of B. G. Ananiyev on the Background of Philosophic Anthropology

A. A. Piskoppel
{"title":"«Chelovekoznaniye» (Knowledge of Man) of B. G. Ananiyev on the Background of Philosophic Anthropology","authors":"A. A. Piskoppel","doi":"10.20323/1813-145x-2021-6-123-117-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chelovekoznaniye of B. G. Ananiyev, «a plan of XXI psychology», belongs to that area of knowledge which borders and even intersects philosophy. It is the area of «psychological anthropology», the area of attempts to come to wider definitions of its object, and these are older than the «scientific» psychology itself, that counts down from W. Wundt. Traditionally it was philosophic anthropology that was concerned with the essence of «man and human society» and the idea of chelovekoznaniye essentially presupposed the orientation to the content of philosophic-anthropological reflexion. As B. G. Ananiyev relied only on the «dialectico-materialistic teaching» as a branch of philosophic thought grown from the German classical philosophy the philosophic-anthropological basis of his enterprise inevitably remained limited and narrowed on the background of both historical and modern forms of the world philosophic thought. The modern significance of this «plan of XXI psychology» could not be valued without investigating it on this background. The philosophic anthropology from the beginning of XX century has lived through many transformations. First of all, there was a galactic explosion: it has broken into an infinite number of anthropologies — political, cultural, social, pedagogical, religious. This process does not come to an end. The differentiation of philosophic-anthropological knowledge continues in the form of different approaches of the non-classical anthropology. The history of unsuccessful search of human nature and essence has shown that «the human is not given as nature but is made as project «. Human projects are molded, constructed, created. They are «man-made», created by means of cultural practices. The modern non-classical anthropology is interested in mass, socially significant trends, more than that, the trends which being followed do change radically the way of life of man, his identity. Being such «experiments on oneself» (transtrends) which lead to leaving the historical scene by man and , которые, по сути дела, направлены на уход человека с исторической сцены и replacing him with a close, but different being.","PeriodicalId":122230,"journal":{"name":"Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20323/1813-145x-2021-6-123-117-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chelovekoznaniye of B. G. Ananiyev, «a plan of XXI psychology», belongs to that area of knowledge which borders and even intersects philosophy. It is the area of «psychological anthropology», the area of attempts to come to wider definitions of its object, and these are older than the «scientific» psychology itself, that counts down from W. Wundt. Traditionally it was philosophic anthropology that was concerned with the essence of «man and human society» and the idea of chelovekoznaniye essentially presupposed the orientation to the content of philosophic-anthropological reflexion. As B. G. Ananiyev relied only on the «dialectico-materialistic teaching» as a branch of philosophic thought grown from the German classical philosophy the philosophic-anthropological basis of his enterprise inevitably remained limited and narrowed on the background of both historical and modern forms of the world philosophic thought. The modern significance of this «plan of XXI psychology» could not be valued without investigating it on this background. The philosophic anthropology from the beginning of XX century has lived through many transformations. First of all, there was a galactic explosion: it has broken into an infinite number of anthropologies — political, cultural, social, pedagogical, religious. This process does not come to an end. The differentiation of philosophic-anthropological knowledge continues in the form of different approaches of the non-classical anthropology. The history of unsuccessful search of human nature and essence has shown that «the human is not given as nature but is made as project «. Human projects are molded, constructed, created. They are «man-made», created by means of cultural practices. The modern non-classical anthropology is interested in mass, socially significant trends, more than that, the trends which being followed do change radically the way of life of man, his identity. Being such «experiments on oneself» (transtrends) which lead to leaving the historical scene by man and , которые, по сути дела, направлены на уход человека с исторической сцены и replacing him with a close, but different being.
b·g·阿纳尼耶夫的《人的知识》:哲学人类学背景
B. G. Ananiyev的Chelovekoznaniye,“21世纪心理学计划”,属于与哲学相邻甚至交叉的知识领域。这是“心理人类学”的领域,这是一个试图对其对象做出更广泛定义的领域,这些定义比“科学”心理学本身更古老,从W. Wundt开始倒计时。传统上,哲学人类学关注的是“人与人类社会”的本质,而chelovekoznaniye的思想本质上预设了哲学人类学反思内容的取向。由于阿纳尼耶夫仅仅依靠“辩证唯物主义学说”作为从德国古典哲学发展而来的哲学思想分支,他的事业的哲学人类学基础不可避免地在世界哲学思想的历史和现代形式的背景下受到限制和狭隘。如果不在这一背景下对这一“21世纪心理学计划”进行考察,就无法评价它的现代意义。20世纪初以来,哲学人类学经历了多次变革。首先,有一个银河爆炸:它已经分裂成无数的人类学——政治的、文化的、社会的、教育的、宗教的。这个过程并没有结束。哲学-人类学知识的分化以非古典人类学的不同研究方法的形式继续存在。对人性和本质的不成功探索的历史表明,“人不是作为自然被赋予的,而是作为工程被创造出来的”。人类的项目是被塑造、构造、创造的。它们是“人造的”,是通过文化实践创造出来的。现代非古典人类学对大众的,有社会意义的趋势感兴趣,更重要的是,人们所遵循的趋势确实从根本上改变了人的生活方式,他的身份。这样的«实验自己»(transtrends)导致离开男人和历史场景,которые,посутидела,направленынауходчеловекасисторическойсценыи取代他,但是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书