E. Hopkins, Jacqueline Mazzeo, Vinh Nguyen, Emma Peck, Kelcie Satterthwaite, Carlos Lidón, G. J. Gerling
{"title":"Developing a Criteria-Based Evaluation Tool for User Experience Design that Balances Standardization and Creativity","authors":"E. Hopkins, Jacqueline Mazzeo, Vinh Nguyen, Emma Peck, Kelcie Satterthwaite, Carlos Lidón, G. J. Gerling","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design systems are increasing in popularity, created to ensure a consistent aesthetic of graphics and interactions in websites and apps, and guide product development. They tend to include a set of standards, principles, and documentation. Due to their often-rigid requirements on structure and uniformity, traditional design systems can discourage creativity and customization. To forge a balance, the work develops a criteria-based evaluation tool, or ‘scorecard’ for assessing design components that incorporate principles of consistent, standardized practice, yet prioritize creative freedom. The evaluation scorecard allows inconsistencies to be managed in a collaborative and consensus-based manner. Users select parameters and metrics to evaluate the various elements of a design component. The tool calculates a score based on the number of parameters passed or failed. Scores below team-desired thresholds signal a need for further modification or redesign. Usability feedback using talk-aloud and surveys in a focus group format assess the ease of use and efficiency of the tool and identify gaps in functionality.","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"244 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Design systems are increasing in popularity, created to ensure a consistent aesthetic of graphics and interactions in websites and apps, and guide product development. They tend to include a set of standards, principles, and documentation. Due to their often-rigid requirements on structure and uniformity, traditional design systems can discourage creativity and customization. To forge a balance, the work develops a criteria-based evaluation tool, or ‘scorecard’ for assessing design components that incorporate principles of consistent, standardized practice, yet prioritize creative freedom. The evaluation scorecard allows inconsistencies to be managed in a collaborative and consensus-based manner. Users select parameters and metrics to evaluate the various elements of a design component. The tool calculates a score based on the number of parameters passed or failed. Scores below team-desired thresholds signal a need for further modification or redesign. Usability feedback using talk-aloud and surveys in a focus group format assess the ease of use and efficiency of the tool and identify gaps in functionality.