Developing a Criteria-Based Evaluation Tool for User Experience Design that Balances Standardization and Creativity

E. Hopkins, Jacqueline Mazzeo, Vinh Nguyen, Emma Peck, Kelcie Satterthwaite, Carlos Lidón, G. J. Gerling
{"title":"Developing a Criteria-Based Evaluation Tool for User Experience Design that Balances Standardization and Creativity","authors":"E. Hopkins, Jacqueline Mazzeo, Vinh Nguyen, Emma Peck, Kelcie Satterthwaite, Carlos Lidón, G. J. Gerling","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design systems are increasing in popularity, created to ensure a consistent aesthetic of graphics and interactions in websites and apps, and guide product development. They tend to include a set of standards, principles, and documentation. Due to their often-rigid requirements on structure and uniformity, traditional design systems can discourage creativity and customization. To forge a balance, the work develops a criteria-based evaluation tool, or ‘scorecard’ for assessing design components that incorporate principles of consistent, standardized practice, yet prioritize creative freedom. The evaluation scorecard allows inconsistencies to be managed in a collaborative and consensus-based manner. Users select parameters and metrics to evaluate the various elements of a design component. The tool calculates a score based on the number of parameters passed or failed. Scores below team-desired thresholds signal a need for further modification or redesign. Usability feedback using talk-aloud and surveys in a focus group format assess the ease of use and efficiency of the tool and identify gaps in functionality.","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"244 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design systems are increasing in popularity, created to ensure a consistent aesthetic of graphics and interactions in websites and apps, and guide product development. They tend to include a set of standards, principles, and documentation. Due to their often-rigid requirements on structure and uniformity, traditional design systems can discourage creativity and customization. To forge a balance, the work develops a criteria-based evaluation tool, or ‘scorecard’ for assessing design components that incorporate principles of consistent, standardized practice, yet prioritize creative freedom. The evaluation scorecard allows inconsistencies to be managed in a collaborative and consensus-based manner. Users select parameters and metrics to evaluate the various elements of a design component. The tool calculates a score based on the number of parameters passed or failed. Scores below team-desired thresholds signal a need for further modification or redesign. Usability feedback using talk-aloud and surveys in a focus group format assess the ease of use and efficiency of the tool and identify gaps in functionality.
开发一个基于标准的用户体验设计评估工具,平衡标准化和创造性
设计系统越来越受欢迎,旨在确保网站和应用程序中图形和交互的一致美学,并指导产品开发。它们往往包括一组标准、原则和文档。由于对结构和统一性的严格要求,传统的设计系统可能会阻碍创造力和定制。为了建立一个平衡,该工作开发了一个基于标准的评估工具,或“记分卡”,用于评估设计组件,包括一致的原则,标准化的实践,但优先考虑创造性的自由。评估记分卡允许以协作和基于共识的方式管理不一致性。用户选择参数和度量来评估设计组件的各种元素。该工具根据通过或失败的参数数量计算分数。分数低于团队期望的阈值表明需要进一步修改或重新设计。可用性反馈使用大声交谈和焦点小组形式的调查来评估工具的易用性和效率,并确定功能上的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信