The financial industry and challenges related to post-crises exit strategies

Gert D. Wehinger
{"title":"The financial industry and challenges related to post-crises exit strategies","authors":"Gert D. Wehinger","doi":"10.1787/FMT-V2009-ART12-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial markets have recovered substantially but vulnerabilities remain significant. Ample liquidity may lead to new bubbles, particularly in some emerging markets, and uncertainties about government exit strategies and regulatory changes threaten a fledgling upswing. Co-ordination and communication of exit policies will be important, and exit from policy stimulus should not be precipitated at the current juncture. While financial institutions have increasingly obtained market financing and paid back state aid, the sector remains fragile; thus, such voluntary pay-backs should meet preconditions aimed at ensuring the soundness and sustainability of the concerned institutions’ balance sheets. At the same time, expectations of future writedowns and more stringent capital rules put pressure on bank lending more generally. Restarting securitisation to support lending would be important and could be fostered by government initiatives focussing on standardisation, transparency and due diligence to restore investor confidence. Regulatory reforms currently being proposed concern accounting rules, capital requirements and compensation issues. However, further reforms are required to address such systemic issues as moral hazard created by public support. Measures would include resolution mechanisms for large and systemically important banks as well as appropriately fire-walled business structures for the financial sector. Peer pressure via co-operation in international standard-setting and relevant bodies should help to keep the reform momentum, overcome political impediments to reform and maintain a level playing field.","PeriodicalId":444795,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Journal: Financial Market Trends","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Journal: Financial Market Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/FMT-V2009-ART12-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Financial markets have recovered substantially but vulnerabilities remain significant. Ample liquidity may lead to new bubbles, particularly in some emerging markets, and uncertainties about government exit strategies and regulatory changes threaten a fledgling upswing. Co-ordination and communication of exit policies will be important, and exit from policy stimulus should not be precipitated at the current juncture. While financial institutions have increasingly obtained market financing and paid back state aid, the sector remains fragile; thus, such voluntary pay-backs should meet preconditions aimed at ensuring the soundness and sustainability of the concerned institutions’ balance sheets. At the same time, expectations of future writedowns and more stringent capital rules put pressure on bank lending more generally. Restarting securitisation to support lending would be important and could be fostered by government initiatives focussing on standardisation, transparency and due diligence to restore investor confidence. Regulatory reforms currently being proposed concern accounting rules, capital requirements and compensation issues. However, further reforms are required to address such systemic issues as moral hazard created by public support. Measures would include resolution mechanisms for large and systemically important banks as well as appropriately fire-walled business structures for the financial sector. Peer pressure via co-operation in international standard-setting and relevant bodies should help to keep the reform momentum, overcome political impediments to reform and maintain a level playing field.
金融行业与危机后退出战略相关的挑战
金融市场已大幅复苏,但脆弱性依然显著。充足的流动性可能导致新的泡沫,特别是在一些新兴市场,而政府退出战略和监管变化的不确定性威胁着刚刚起步的经济增长。退出政策的协调和沟通将非常重要,不应在当前紧要关头仓促退出政策刺激。虽然金融机构越来越多地获得了市场融资并偿还了国家援助,但该行业仍然脆弱;因此,这种自愿偿还应满足旨在确保有关机构资产负债表健全和可持续性的先决条件。与此同时,对未来资产减记和更严格资本规定的预期,在更大范围内给银行放贷带来了压力。重启证券化以支持贷款将是重要的,政府可以通过注重标准化、透明度和尽职调查的举措来促进证券化,以恢复投资者的信心。目前提出的监管改革涉及会计准则、资本要求和薪酬问题。然而,需要进一步改革,以解决公众支持造成的道德风险等系统性问题。这些措施将包括针对具有系统重要性的大型银行的处置机制,以及为金融业建立适当的火墙式业务结构。通过在国际标准制定和相关机构的合作施加同侪压力,应有助于保持改革势头,克服改革的政治障碍,维持公平竞争的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信