Mathematical Justification Research in Mathematics Education Across Grades: A Systematic Literature Review

Surya Kurniawan, R. Rosjanuardi, A. Aswin
{"title":"Mathematical Justification Research in Mathematics Education Across Grades: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Surya Kurniawan, R. Rosjanuardi, A. Aswin","doi":"10.18326/hipotenusa.v4i2.7815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Justification is a set of responses or responses that a person gives when asked to provide mathematical reasons for the results he makes. Justification can be used as a social process in which mathematical knowledge is explained, and systematically verified based on ideas, definitions, and properties that apply in mathematics such as representations used to display concepts. Research on justification in mathematics education has been carried out for a long time. This study aims to evaluate mathematics justification studies from articles published after 2016 and before April 2022 from ERIC and Google Scholar Databases. The key questions in this study are how these articles are distributed based on year publication, country, participant, mathematics subject, method, and how to support mathematical justification. This study used a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines including inclusion and exclusion criteria and then the data were extracted, resulting in 30 studies to be reviewed. The result shows that by year of publication the articles fluctuation distributed, based on country no data from Africa and Australia was found in the databases, the participant is mostly preservice mathematics teachers, whereas only one publication studied in high school students, geometry is the most mathematics subject used in research since every grade contain this material, the method is frequently given by qualitative research with various approach, how to supporting mathematical justification is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":134360,"journal":{"name":"Hipotenusa : Journal of Mathematical Society","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hipotenusa : Journal of Mathematical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v4i2.7815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Justification is a set of responses or responses that a person gives when asked to provide mathematical reasons for the results he makes. Justification can be used as a social process in which mathematical knowledge is explained, and systematically verified based on ideas, definitions, and properties that apply in mathematics such as representations used to display concepts. Research on justification in mathematics education has been carried out for a long time. This study aims to evaluate mathematics justification studies from articles published after 2016 and before April 2022 from ERIC and Google Scholar Databases. The key questions in this study are how these articles are distributed based on year publication, country, participant, mathematics subject, method, and how to support mathematical justification. This study used a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines including inclusion and exclusion criteria and then the data were extracted, resulting in 30 studies to be reviewed. The result shows that by year of publication the articles fluctuation distributed, based on country no data from Africa and Australia was found in the databases, the participant is mostly preservice mathematics teachers, whereas only one publication studied in high school students, geometry is the most mathematics subject used in research since every grade contain this material, the method is frequently given by qualitative research with various approach, how to supporting mathematical justification is also discussed.
跨年级数学教育中的数学论证研究:系统文献综述
正当理由是当一个人被要求为他所做的结果提供数学上的理由时,他给出的一组或多个回应。论证可以作为一个社会过程,在这个过程中,数学知识被解释,并基于适用于数学的思想、定义和属性(如用于显示概念的表示)被系统地验证。数学教育中正当性问题的研究由来已久。本研究旨在评估2016年之后和2022年4月之前在ERIC和Google Scholar数据库中发表的数学论证研究。本研究的关键问题是这些文章如何根据出版年份、国家、参与者、数学科目、方法进行分布,以及如何支持数学证明。本研究采用系统文献综述(SLR),采用首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,包括纳入标准和排除标准,然后提取数据,共纳入30项研究。结果表明,文章按出版年份的波动分布,基于非洲和澳大利亚的国家数据在数据库中没有发现,参与者主要是职前数学教师,而只有一份出版物在高中学生中研究,几何是研究中使用最多的数学学科,因为每个年级都包含这种材料,方法通常是通过定性研究和各种方法给出的。讨论了如何支持数学论证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信