Bridging Text Mining and Bayesian Networks

Sandeep Raghuram, Yuni Xia, M. Palakal, Josette F. Jones, Dave Pecenka, E. Tinsley, Jean Bandos, Jerry Geesaman
{"title":"Bridging Text Mining and Bayesian Networks","authors":"Sandeep Raghuram, Yuni Xia, M. Palakal, Josette F. Jones, Dave Pecenka, E. Tinsley, Jean Bandos, Jerry Geesaman","doi":"10.1109/NBiS.2009.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bayesian networks need to be updated as and when new data is observed. Literature mining is a very important source of this new data after the initial network is constructed using the expert’s knowledge. In this work, we specifically interested in the causal associations and experimental results obtained from literature mining. However, these associations and numerical results cannot be directly integrated with the Bayesian network. The source of the literature and the perceived quality of research needs to be factored into the process of integration, just like a human, reading the literature, would. We present a general methodology for deriving a confidence measure for the mined data and provide inputs to the expert for resolving the modeling issues in integrating it with the existing network.","PeriodicalId":312802,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NBiS.2009.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Bayesian networks need to be updated as and when new data is observed. Literature mining is a very important source of this new data after the initial network is constructed using the expert’s knowledge. In this work, we specifically interested in the causal associations and experimental results obtained from literature mining. However, these associations and numerical results cannot be directly integrated with the Bayesian network. The source of the literature and the perceived quality of research needs to be factored into the process of integration, just like a human, reading the literature, would. We present a general methodology for deriving a confidence measure for the mined data and provide inputs to the expert for resolving the modeling issues in integrating it with the existing network.
桥接文本挖掘和贝叶斯网络
当观察到新的数据时,贝叶斯网络需要更新。在利用专家知识构建初始网络后,文献挖掘是获取新数据的重要来源。在这项工作中,我们特别感兴趣的是因果关系和从文献挖掘中获得的实验结果。然而,这些关联和数值结果不能直接与贝叶斯网络集成。文献的来源和研究的感知质量需要被纳入整合的过程中,就像人类阅读文献一样。我们提出了一种通用的方法来推导挖掘数据的置信度度量,并为专家提供输入,以解决与现有网络集成时的建模问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信