Grading by Jury: Accurate and Consistent

G. Peek
{"title":"Grading by Jury: Accurate and Consistent","authors":"G. Peek","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1982.10533758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Of greatest concern to the department was the charge that jury-grading was racist in nature; additionally, some teachers and administrators thought the system in fringed on academic freedom. Although incomplete, the data we have suggest that while many persons perceived jury-grading to be a failure, the experiment did, in fact, achieve one major goal for which we strove, that is, the objective, accurate, and consistent evaluation of student performance on written themes. For many years students and faculty have viewed the English Department at ASU as having a wide variety of grading practices and standards. In a 28-person depart ment, some variety, of course, is desirable, but in freshman composition the range of grading possibilities was almost ridiculous. In several classes over a two-year","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1982.10533758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Of greatest concern to the department was the charge that jury-grading was racist in nature; additionally, some teachers and administrators thought the system in fringed on academic freedom. Although incomplete, the data we have suggest that while many persons perceived jury-grading to be a failure, the experiment did, in fact, achieve one major goal for which we strove, that is, the objective, accurate, and consistent evaluation of student performance on written themes. For many years students and faculty have viewed the English Department at ASU as having a wide variety of grading practices and standards. In a 28-person depart ment, some variety, of course, is desirable, but in freshman composition the range of grading possibilities was almost ridiculous. In several classes over a two-year
评审团评分:准确一致
司法部最关心的是,有人指控陪审团的评分具有种族主义性质;此外,一些教师和管理人员认为该制度限制了学术自由。虽然不完整,但我们的数据表明,虽然许多人认为评委会评分是失败的,但事实上,这个实验确实实现了我们努力的一个主要目标,即客观、准确和一致地评价学生在书面主题上的表现。多年来,学生和教师都认为亚利桑那州立大学英语系有各种各样的评分方法和标准。在一个28人的部门里,一些变化当然是可取的,但在新生作文中,评分的可能性几乎是荒谬的。在两年多的时间里上过几堂课
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信