Do Significant Labour Market Events Change Who Does the Laundry? Work, Chore Allocation, and Power in Australian Households

Gigi Foster, Leslie S. Stratton
{"title":"Do Significant Labour Market Events Change Who Does the Laundry? Work, Chore Allocation, and Power in Australian Households","authors":"Gigi Foster, Leslie S. Stratton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2926739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examine how men and women in mixed-gender unions change their allocation of time to housework in response to promotions and terminations in the labour market. Operating much like raises, such events have the potential to alter power dynamics within the household, as well as labour force commitments. Using Australian panel data on married and cohabiting couples, we first show evidence that promotions and terminations are plausibly exogenous to housework time allocations, then estimate gender and couple-specific fixed effects models of housework time as a function of both own and partner’s labour market events. Of the four types of labour market events we examine – male and female promotion, and male and female termination – female promotion is the strongest predictor of housework time allocation adjustments. These adjustments are in part due to concurrent changes in paid work time, but gender power relations also appear to play a role. Further results indicate that although large gender gaps in housework time exist regardless of labour market activity, households holding more liberal gender role attitudes, and those that are less time-constrained, are those most likely to adjust their housework time allocations after female promotion events. Power dynamics cannot, however, explain all the results. Supporting the sociological theory that partners may ‘do gender’ ( i.e., try to compensate behaviourally for phenomena that run contrary to gender stereotypes), we find that in households with more traditional gender role attitudes that experience a male termination event, his housework time falls while hers rises.","PeriodicalId":180753,"journal":{"name":"UNSW: Economics (Topic)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNSW: Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2926739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we examine how men and women in mixed-gender unions change their allocation of time to housework in response to promotions and terminations in the labour market. Operating much like raises, such events have the potential to alter power dynamics within the household, as well as labour force commitments. Using Australian panel data on married and cohabiting couples, we first show evidence that promotions and terminations are plausibly exogenous to housework time allocations, then estimate gender and couple-specific fixed effects models of housework time as a function of both own and partner’s labour market events. Of the four types of labour market events we examine – male and female promotion, and male and female termination – female promotion is the strongest predictor of housework time allocation adjustments. These adjustments are in part due to concurrent changes in paid work time, but gender power relations also appear to play a role. Further results indicate that although large gender gaps in housework time exist regardless of labour market activity, households holding more liberal gender role attitudes, and those that are less time-constrained, are those most likely to adjust their housework time allocations after female promotion events. Power dynamics cannot, however, explain all the results. Supporting the sociological theory that partners may ‘do gender’ ( i.e., try to compensate behaviourally for phenomena that run contrary to gender stereotypes), we find that in households with more traditional gender role attitudes that experience a male termination event, his housework time falls while hers rises.
重大的劳动力市场事件会改变谁洗衣吗?澳大利亚家庭的工作、家务分配和权力
在本文中,我们研究了混合性别工会中的男性和女性如何根据劳动力市场上的晋升和解雇改变他们在家务上的时间分配。类似于加薪,这类事件有可能改变家庭内部的权力动态,以及劳动力承诺。利用澳大利亚已婚和同居夫妇的面板数据,我们首先展示了晋升和解雇对家务劳动时间分配似乎是外生的证据,然后估计了性别和夫妻特定的家务劳动时间固定效应模型,作为自己和伴侣劳动力市场事件的函数。在我们研究的四种类型的劳动力市场事件中——男性和女性的晋升,以及男性和女性的解雇——女性的晋升是家务时间分配调整的最强预测因子。这些调整部分是由于带薪工作时间的同步变化,但性别权力关系似乎也发挥了作用。进一步的结果表明,尽管在家务劳动时间上存在较大的性别差异,但无论劳动力市场活动如何,持有更自由的性别角色态度的家庭,以及那些时间限制较少的家庭,最有可能在女性晋升事件后调整家务劳动时间分配。然而,权力动力学并不能解释所有的结果。支持社会学理论,即伴侣可能“做性别”(即,试图从行为上补偿与性别刻板印象相反的现象),我们发现,在经历男性终止事件的更传统的性别角色态度的家庭中,他的家务时间减少,而她的家务时间增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信