Loss of rural Appalachian recovery meetings from before to after COVID-19.

Mary Jo Hedrick, A. Clements
{"title":"Loss of rural Appalachian recovery meetings from before to after COVID-19.","authors":"Mary Jo Hedrick, A. Clements","doi":"10.1037/rmh0000235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sharp rises in overdose deaths nationally coincided with the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rural Appalachia, known for high rates of substance use and barriers to health care in general, was suspected to be disproportionately impacted in terms of recovery supports such as 12-step recovery meetings. This study investigated the availability of recovery meetings in South Central Appalachia before and after COVID-19 lockdowns. The number of confirmed recovery meetings was compared before and after COVID-19 lockdowns by geographic location (i.e., rural/nonrural and medium metro/small metro/micropolitan/noncore). Recovery meeting data were systematically collected through interviews with community contacts, reviewing social media and websites, making phone calls, and sending emails and surveys and updated longitudinally. There was no significant change in the number of meetings from pre- (n = 189) to post-COVID-19 (n = 178). There was no significant shift in meeting location when dichotomizing by rural/nonrural classification, chi2(1) = 2.76, p = .097, pi = -0.087. Chi-square test of independence did reveal a significant change in number of recovery meetings by location when using four location classifications, chi2(3) = 7.97, p = .047, Cramer's V = 0.147. There was a noteworthy rise in the meetings in small metro (36.5%-51.1%), with all other locations declining. The establishment and reestablishment of recovery meetings in rural communities should be prioritized to address the longstanding scarcity of recovery resources in rural locations, recent decline in such support, and the rise in overdose deaths. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement This study highlights a significant barrier to recovery from problematic substance use in rural areas. Strategically establishing recovery meetings in areas with few or no meetings and facilitating access through addressing transportation is critical. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":344850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural mental health","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sharp rises in overdose deaths nationally coincided with the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rural Appalachia, known for high rates of substance use and barriers to health care in general, was suspected to be disproportionately impacted in terms of recovery supports such as 12-step recovery meetings. This study investigated the availability of recovery meetings in South Central Appalachia before and after COVID-19 lockdowns. The number of confirmed recovery meetings was compared before and after COVID-19 lockdowns by geographic location (i.e., rural/nonrural and medium metro/small metro/micropolitan/noncore). Recovery meeting data were systematically collected through interviews with community contacts, reviewing social media and websites, making phone calls, and sending emails and surveys and updated longitudinally. There was no significant change in the number of meetings from pre- (n = 189) to post-COVID-19 (n = 178). There was no significant shift in meeting location when dichotomizing by rural/nonrural classification, chi2(1) = 2.76, p = .097, pi = -0.087. Chi-square test of independence did reveal a significant change in number of recovery meetings by location when using four location classifications, chi2(3) = 7.97, p = .047, Cramer's V = 0.147. There was a noteworthy rise in the meetings in small metro (36.5%-51.1%), with all other locations declining. The establishment and reestablishment of recovery meetings in rural communities should be prioritized to address the longstanding scarcity of recovery resources in rural locations, recent decline in such support, and the rise in overdose deaths. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement This study highlights a significant barrier to recovery from problematic substance use in rural areas. Strategically establishing recovery meetings in areas with few or no meetings and facilitating access through addressing transportation is critical. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
COVID-19之前和之后阿巴拉契亚农村恢复会议的损失。
与COVID-19大流行的到来同时,全国过量死亡人数急剧上升。阿巴拉契亚农村地区以药物使用率高和一般的保健障碍而闻名,据怀疑在12步康复会议等康复支助方面受到了不成比例的影响。本研究调查了COVID-19封锁前后阿巴拉契亚中南部恢复会议的可用性。按地理位置(即农村/非农村、中型地铁/小型地铁/微型城市/非核心城市)比较COVID-19封锁前后确认的康复会议次数。通过与社区联系人的访谈、查看社交媒体和网站、打电话、发送电子邮件和调查等方式系统收集康复会议数据,并进行纵向更新。从covid -19之前(n = 189)到之后(n = 178),会议次数没有显著变化。按农村/非农村分类时,会议地点无显著变化,chi2(1) = 2.76, p = 0.097, pi = -0.087。卡方独立性检验显示,当使用四种地点分类时,不同地点的恢复会议数量发生了显著变化,chi2(3) = 7.97, p = 0.047, Cramer's V = 0.147。小型地铁的会议率显著上升(36.5%-51.1%),其他地区的会议率均有所下降。应优先考虑在农村社区建立和重建康复会议,以解决农村地区长期缺乏康复资源、最近此类支持减少以及吸毒过量死亡人数上升的问题。(心理信息数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,所有权利保留)影响声明本研究强调了农村地区从问题物质使用中恢复的重大障碍。在会议很少或没有会议的地区战略性地建立恢复会议,并通过解决交通问题促进进入至关重要。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信