How Sustainable are OECD Current Account Balances in the Long Run?

Mark J. Holmes
{"title":"How Sustainable are OECD Current Account Balances in the Long Run?","authors":"Mark J. Holmes","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00514.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines the long-run sustainability of OECD current account balances. For this purpose, tests for current account stationarity and then cointegration between exports and imports are based on recently developed panel data methods that offer increased power over existing time-series techniques. Unlike existing panel studies on this topic, this study utilizes techniques that enable the examination of sustainability for individual panel members. The first stage of the investigation relies on a novel approach to unit root testing whereby tests for stationarity are conducted within a seemingly unrelated regression framework. The second stage involves the estimation of the long-run relationship between exports and imports by a range of recently developed panel data techniques advocated by Pedroni. Using a panel of 11 OECD countries, the results from these techniques suggest that sustainability is present in six countries at most. Also, sustainability is generally a characteristic of the non-Euro countries. These results can be contrasted with existing group mean unit root and cointegration tests that indicate sustainability for the group as a whole.","PeriodicalId":130467,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Manchester School","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"72","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Manchester School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00514.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

Abstract

The study examines the long-run sustainability of OECD current account balances. For this purpose, tests for current account stationarity and then cointegration between exports and imports are based on recently developed panel data methods that offer increased power over existing time-series techniques. Unlike existing panel studies on this topic, this study utilizes techniques that enable the examination of sustainability for individual panel members. The first stage of the investigation relies on a novel approach to unit root testing whereby tests for stationarity are conducted within a seemingly unrelated regression framework. The second stage involves the estimation of the long-run relationship between exports and imports by a range of recently developed panel data techniques advocated by Pedroni. Using a panel of 11 OECD countries, the results from these techniques suggest that sustainability is present in six countries at most. Also, sustainability is generally a characteristic of the non-Euro countries. These results can be contrasted with existing group mean unit root and cointegration tests that indicate sustainability for the group as a whole.
经合组织经常账户平衡的长期可持续性如何?
该研究考察了经合组织经常账户余额的长期可持续性。为此目的,对经常账户平稳性以及出口和进口之间的协整性进行检验,是基于最近开发的面板数据方法,这种方法比现有的时间序列技术更有力。与现有的关于该主题的小组研究不同,本研究利用了能够对个别小组成员的可持续性进行检查的技术。调查的第一阶段依赖于一种新颖的单位根检验方法,即在看似无关的回归框架内进行平稳性检验。第二阶段涉及通过佩德罗尼提倡的一系列最近开发的面板数据技术来估计出口和进口之间的长期关系。通过对11个经合组织国家的调查,这些技术的结果表明,最多只有6个国家具有可持续性。此外,可持续性通常是非欧元国家的一个特点。这些结果可以与现有的群体平均单位根和协整检验进行对比,这些检验表明群体作为一个整体的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信