Mandatory Disclosure Rules – Selected Problems

Dorota Walerjan
{"title":"Mandatory Disclosure Rules – Selected Problems","authors":"Dorota Walerjan","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.5735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with issues related to the introduction of provisions concerning mandatory disclosure and tax reporting rules (MDR) in the Polish legal system. Due to the multifaceted nature and level of complexity of these new regulations, the article focuses on those aspects that are most relevant for activities carried out on the insurance market.\nContrary to the common understanding of the concept of a tax scheme, reporting obligations under the MDR include transactions and operations related to tax optimization as well as standard advice or activity, as long as they meet statutory conditions. In addition, the scope of entities responsible for the implementation of the MDR is wide. Apart from the entity that \"uses\" the scheme, the reporting duties can apply to almost everyone who is professionally involved in the scheme's development, organization, or implementation.\nThe first months of the new regulations have shown that interpretation and application are not only time-consuming, but more importantly, burdened with significant risks. Their sources include, firstly, the extremely vague and complicated provisions themselves, and, secondly, the practical considerations related to the possibility of the misinterpretation of facts or of defective assessments in situations where participants have limited knowledge or experience. These risks are of key importance due to the fact that the incorrect application of the MDR regulations can result in penal fiscal sanctions for those responsible for their implementation.\n\n","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article deals with issues related to the introduction of provisions concerning mandatory disclosure and tax reporting rules (MDR) in the Polish legal system. Due to the multifaceted nature and level of complexity of these new regulations, the article focuses on those aspects that are most relevant for activities carried out on the insurance market. Contrary to the common understanding of the concept of a tax scheme, reporting obligations under the MDR include transactions and operations related to tax optimization as well as standard advice or activity, as long as they meet statutory conditions. In addition, the scope of entities responsible for the implementation of the MDR is wide. Apart from the entity that "uses" the scheme, the reporting duties can apply to almost everyone who is professionally involved in the scheme's development, organization, or implementation. The first months of the new regulations have shown that interpretation and application are not only time-consuming, but more importantly, burdened with significant risks. Their sources include, firstly, the extremely vague and complicated provisions themselves, and, secondly, the practical considerations related to the possibility of the misinterpretation of facts or of defective assessments in situations where participants have limited knowledge or experience. These risks are of key importance due to the fact that the incorrect application of the MDR regulations can result in penal fiscal sanctions for those responsible for their implementation.
强制披露规则-选定问题
该条论述了在波兰法律制度中引入有关强制性披露和税务报告规则(MDR)的规定的问题。由于这些新法规的多面性和复杂性,本文将重点关注与保险市场上开展的活动最相关的那些方面。与对税收计划概念的普遍理解相反,MDR下的报告义务包括与税收优化相关的交易和操作以及标准建议或活动,只要它们符合法定条件。此外,负责实施《多抗药性报告》的实体范围很广。除了“使用”计划的实体之外,报告职责几乎适用于参与计划开发、组织或实施的所有专业人员。新规实施的头几个月表明,解释和实施不仅耗时,更重要的是,风险很大。它们的来源包括,首先,极其模糊和复杂的规定本身,其次,在参与者知识或经验有限的情况下,与误解事实或有缺陷的评估的可能性有关的实际考虑。这些风险至关重要,因为不正确地适用MDR法规可能导致对实施这些法规的责任人进行刑事财政制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信