Identifying Competency Gaps Among Engineering Students in a Post K-12 Setting Through the Use of Clustering Algorithms

John Raymond B. Barajas, Pee Jay N. Gealone, Marben S. Ramos, Nico O. Aspra, Arpon T. Lucero, Oliver M. Padua
{"title":"Identifying Competency Gaps Among Engineering Students in a Post K-12 Setting Through the Use of Clustering Algorithms","authors":"John Raymond B. Barajas, Pee Jay N. Gealone, Marben S. Ramos, Nico O. Aspra, Arpon T. Lucero, Oliver M. Padua","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper leverages on the power of clustering algorithms to determine potential deficiencies in mathematics competencies of incoming first year engineering students who are graduates of the recently implemented K to 12 program. To achieve this objective, a total of 23 prerequisite mathematics competencies in Algebra, Advance Algebra, Plane and Spherical Trigonometry, Analytical Geometry, and Solid Mensuration common to engineering programs offered in the country were identified from the approved policies, standards, and guidelines published by the Commission on Higher Education. A survey instrument was developed to assess the self-rated proficiencies of participating respondents in these competencies using a 5-point liker scale (5 being the highest). Results of the clustering analysis showed the formation of four distinct groups of students based on their self-rated proficiencies: (1) above average, (2) average, (3) below average, and (4) poor. It was found that participants generally gave low self-ratings to Advanced Algebra and Analytic Geometry prerequisites. Although it is expected for non-STEM graduates of the K to 12 program to struggle in engineering programs, further analysis of the clusters revealed that about half of the STEM respondents self-rated their proficiencies in the below average and poor clusters. Though it may be argued that this finding may need to be explored further in the absence of ground truth labels, diagnostic examination scores garnered by the participants validate this observation. In conclusion, this study highlights the need for universities to implement targeted intervention programs to address the identified deficiencies and ensure the success of their enrollees in engineering programs.","PeriodicalId":267464,"journal":{"name":"2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper leverages on the power of clustering algorithms to determine potential deficiencies in mathematics competencies of incoming first year engineering students who are graduates of the recently implemented K to 12 program. To achieve this objective, a total of 23 prerequisite mathematics competencies in Algebra, Advance Algebra, Plane and Spherical Trigonometry, Analytical Geometry, and Solid Mensuration common to engineering programs offered in the country were identified from the approved policies, standards, and guidelines published by the Commission on Higher Education. A survey instrument was developed to assess the self-rated proficiencies of participating respondents in these competencies using a 5-point liker scale (5 being the highest). Results of the clustering analysis showed the formation of four distinct groups of students based on their self-rated proficiencies: (1) above average, (2) average, (3) below average, and (4) poor. It was found that participants generally gave low self-ratings to Advanced Algebra and Analytic Geometry prerequisites. Although it is expected for non-STEM graduates of the K to 12 program to struggle in engineering programs, further analysis of the clusters revealed that about half of the STEM respondents self-rated their proficiencies in the below average and poor clusters. Though it may be argued that this finding may need to be explored further in the absence of ground truth labels, diagnostic examination scores garnered by the participants validate this observation. In conclusion, this study highlights the need for universities to implement targeted intervention programs to address the identified deficiencies and ensure the success of their enrollees in engineering programs.
通过使用聚类算法识别K-12后工科学生的能力差距
本文利用聚类算法的力量来确定最近实施的K到12计划的一年级工程专业毕业生在数学能力方面的潜在缺陷。为了实现这一目标,从高等教育委员会公布的批准政策、标准和指南中确定了全国工程课程共有的代数、高级代数、平面和球面三角、解析几何和立体测量等23项先决数学能力。开发了一种调查工具,以使用5分的喜欢量表(5为最高)评估参与受访者对这些能力的自评熟练程度。聚类分析结果显示,根据学生的自评熟练程度,形成了四个不同的学生群体:(1)高于平均水平,(2)平均水平,(3)低于平均水平,(4)较差。研究发现,参与者普遍对高等代数和解析几何的先决条件给予较低的自我评价。虽然预计K到12年级的非STEM毕业生在工程项目中会遇到困难,但进一步的分析显示,大约一半的STEM受访者在低于平均水平和较差的集群中自我评估自己的熟练程度。虽然可能有人认为,这一发现可能需要在缺乏真实标签的情况下进一步探索,但参与者获得的诊断性检查分数证实了这一观察结果。总之,本研究强调了大学实施有针对性的干预计划的必要性,以解决已发现的缺陷,并确保其工程专业的招生人员取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信