Public Data Act and humanities data: Applying for open to humanities data held by public institutions

Ba-ro Kim
{"title":"Public Data Act and humanities data: Applying for open to humanities data held by public institutions","authors":"Ba-ro Kim","doi":"10.20516/classic.2022.57.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To examine the present state of data disclosure by public institutions under the Public Data Act, I first analyzed the humanities data compiled by public institutions and explored problems in requesting open to them. In Korea, humanities data are mostly stored and managed with government support. In 2013, the Public Data Act was enacted, mandating that public institutions provide public open to the public data they hold and manage. However, public data in the humanities sector frequently have yet to be disclosed. Although secondary workpieces of public data are provided as a web service, such as the Annals of the Digital Joseon Dynasty, it is necessary to obtain RAWDATA corresponding to the primary feed for digital humanities research, a new form of study of the humanities in the digital environment. However, most humanities institutions that store humanities data do not disclose public data under the Public Data Act, citing reasons such as personal information protection, data updates, and copyright protection despite public data disclosure requests. Therefore, it is necessary to change public institutions’ attitudes toward the disclosure of machine-only RAWDATA such as CSV, XML, and RDF guaranteed by the Public Data Act for the study of the humanities in the digital era. \n","PeriodicalId":196633,"journal":{"name":"The Research of the Korean Classic","volume":"449 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Research of the Korean Classic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20516/classic.2022.57.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine the present state of data disclosure by public institutions under the Public Data Act, I first analyzed the humanities data compiled by public institutions and explored problems in requesting open to them. In Korea, humanities data are mostly stored and managed with government support. In 2013, the Public Data Act was enacted, mandating that public institutions provide public open to the public data they hold and manage. However, public data in the humanities sector frequently have yet to be disclosed. Although secondary workpieces of public data are provided as a web service, such as the Annals of the Digital Joseon Dynasty, it is necessary to obtain RAWDATA corresponding to the primary feed for digital humanities research, a new form of study of the humanities in the digital environment. However, most humanities institutions that store humanities data do not disclose public data under the Public Data Act, citing reasons such as personal information protection, data updates, and copyright protection despite public data disclosure requests. Therefore, it is necessary to change public institutions’ attitudes toward the disclosure of machine-only RAWDATA such as CSV, XML, and RDF guaranteed by the Public Data Act for the study of the humanities in the digital era.
公共数据法和人文数据:申请公共机构持有的对人文数据开放
为了考察公共数据法下公共机构数据公开的现状,我首先分析了公共机构编制的人文数据,并探讨了公共机构要求公开的问题。在韩国,大部分的人文资料都是在政府的支持下储存和管理的。2013年,颁布了《公共数据法》,要求公共机构向公众提供其持有和管理的数据。然而,人文领域的公共数据往往尚未公开。虽然像《数字朝鲜王朝编年史》这样的公共数据的二手作品以网络服务的形式提供,但为了在数字环境下研究人文学科的新形式——数字人文研究,有必要获取与原始资料相对应的RAWDATA。但是,保存人文信息的大部分人文机构,虽然要求公开信息,但以个人信息保护、数据更新、版权保护等为由,并没有根据《公共数据法》公开公共信息。因此,有必要改变公共机构对公共数据法案保障的CSV、XML、RDF等仅限机器的RAWDATA的公开态度,以用于数字时代的人文学科研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信