Dynamic characterization of adobe in compression: the effect of fibre fraction in soil matrix

T. L. Piani
{"title":"Dynamic characterization of adobe in compression: the effect of fibre fraction in soil matrix","authors":"T. L. Piani","doi":"10.21012/fc10.233152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adobe is one of the most ancient forms of masonry. Adobe bricks are sundried mixtures of clay, silt, sand and natural fibres locally available joined together using mud mortar. Adobe structures are largely spread in areas of the world prone to earthquakes or involved in military conflicts. Unfortunately, almost no literature concerns the dynamic assessment of soil-based masonry components. From earlier research, it was derived that the mechanical behaviour of adobe in statics fits in the class of quasi brittle materials. Its resemblance with cementitious materials concerns the main failure modes and the constitutive models in compression. This study deals with the experimental characterization of adobe components response in dynamics. It is aimed to study and quantify the rate sensitivity of adobe material from bricks at a wide range of strain rates, from statics up to impact conditions. In particular, the influence of fiber reinforcement in the mixture on the mechanical behaviour of the material has been addressed. Adobe bricks are commonly mixed using organic content locally available in the field, from straw to chopped wood. Fibres are added to prevent shrinkage cracks during the air drying process. In modern materials such as concrete, inclusion of artificial fibres is originally meant to enhance the mechanical performance of the material, benefiting from the selective properties of reinforcement and binder. An experimental campaign was carried out in a collaboration between Delft University of Technology, Dutch Ministry of Defence, TNO and the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission. Two types of bricks were tested. They both had the same soil composition in terms of mineralogical family and soil elements proportions but only one was mixed using straw and wood. Cylindrical samples were subjected to compression tests at different rates of loadings in compression: low ( _ 1 = 3 10a#x100000;4 sa#x100000;1), intermediate ( _ 2 = 3 sa#x100000;1) and high ( _ 3 = 120 sa#x100000;1). High strain rate tests were performed using the split Hopkinson bar of the Elsa-HopLab (JRC). For each test, high resolution videos registered the failure process and force-displacement plots were recorded. Elaboration of results revealed clear trends in the dynamic material behaviour. Adobe, as concrete, is sensitive to the loading rate. The rate effects on the main properties of the material in strength and deformation are also analytically and numerically quantified. Rate sensitivity and failure mode are significantly influenced by the inclusion of fibers in the mixture. These effects are quantified, interpreted and compared with modern SFRC. This paper presents the experimental campaign and the obtained results. Moreover, physical interpretations for the observed trends are discussed. Finally, new formulations for the assessment of the dynamic increase factor of the compressive strength of adobe are proposed.","PeriodicalId":329531,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21012/fc10.233152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Adobe is one of the most ancient forms of masonry. Adobe bricks are sundried mixtures of clay, silt, sand and natural fibres locally available joined together using mud mortar. Adobe structures are largely spread in areas of the world prone to earthquakes or involved in military conflicts. Unfortunately, almost no literature concerns the dynamic assessment of soil-based masonry components. From earlier research, it was derived that the mechanical behaviour of adobe in statics fits in the class of quasi brittle materials. Its resemblance with cementitious materials concerns the main failure modes and the constitutive models in compression. This study deals with the experimental characterization of adobe components response in dynamics. It is aimed to study and quantify the rate sensitivity of adobe material from bricks at a wide range of strain rates, from statics up to impact conditions. In particular, the influence of fiber reinforcement in the mixture on the mechanical behaviour of the material has been addressed. Adobe bricks are commonly mixed using organic content locally available in the field, from straw to chopped wood. Fibres are added to prevent shrinkage cracks during the air drying process. In modern materials such as concrete, inclusion of artificial fibres is originally meant to enhance the mechanical performance of the material, benefiting from the selective properties of reinforcement and binder. An experimental campaign was carried out in a collaboration between Delft University of Technology, Dutch Ministry of Defence, TNO and the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission. Two types of bricks were tested. They both had the same soil composition in terms of mineralogical family and soil elements proportions but only one was mixed using straw and wood. Cylindrical samples were subjected to compression tests at different rates of loadings in compression: low ( _ 1 = 3 10a#x100000;4 sa#x100000;1), intermediate ( _ 2 = 3 sa#x100000;1) and high ( _ 3 = 120 sa#x100000;1). High strain rate tests were performed using the split Hopkinson bar of the Elsa-HopLab (JRC). For each test, high resolution videos registered the failure process and force-displacement plots were recorded. Elaboration of results revealed clear trends in the dynamic material behaviour. Adobe, as concrete, is sensitive to the loading rate. The rate effects on the main properties of the material in strength and deformation are also analytically and numerically quantified. Rate sensitivity and failure mode are significantly influenced by the inclusion of fibers in the mixture. These effects are quantified, interpreted and compared with modern SFRC. This paper presents the experimental campaign and the obtained results. Moreover, physical interpretations for the observed trends are discussed. Finally, new formulations for the assessment of the dynamic increase factor of the compressive strength of adobe are proposed.
土坯受压动态特性:土基质中纤维组分的影响
土坯是最古老的砌筑形式之一。土坯砖由粘土、淤泥、沙子和当地可用的天然纤维混合而成,用泥浆砂浆粘合在一起。土坯建筑主要分布在世界上地震多发或军事冲突频发的地区。遗憾的是,几乎没有文献关注土基砌体构件的动力评估。从早期的研究中得出,土坯在静力学中的力学行为符合准脆性材料的类别。它与胶凝材料的相似之处在于压缩时的主要破坏模式和本构模型。本文研究了土坯构件动态响应的实验表征。它的目的是研究和量化在大范围的应变速率下,从静态到冲击条件下砖坯材料的速率敏感性。特别是,纤维增强混合物对材料力学性能的影响已经得到解决。土坯砖通常使用当地可获得的有机成分混合,从稻草到切碎的木头。在空气干燥过程中加入纤维以防止收缩裂缝。在混凝土等现代材料中,人造纤维的加入最初是为了增强材料的机械性能,受益于增强剂和粘合剂的选择性。在代尔夫特理工大学、荷兰国防部、TNO和欧洲委员会联合研究中心(JRC)之间的合作下进行了一项实验性运动。测试了两种类型的砖。两者在矿物学家族和土壤元素比例方面具有相同的土壤组成,但只有一个是用稻草和木材混合的。圆柱形试样在不同的压缩速率下进行压缩试验:低(_ 1 = 3 10a#x100000;4 sa#x100000;1)、中(_ 2 = 3 sa#x100000;1)和高(_ 3 = 120 sa#x100000;1)。采用Elsa-HopLab (JRC)的分离式霍普金森杆进行高应变率试验。对于每次测试,高分辨率视频记录了破坏过程和力-位移图。结果的细化揭示了材料动态行为的明确趋势。土坯作为混凝土,对加载速率很敏感。速率对材料强度和变形等主要性能的影响也进行了分析和数值量化。混合料中纤维的掺入对速率灵敏度和失效模式有显著影响。对这些效应进行了量化、解释,并与现代SFRC进行了比较。本文介绍了实验过程和实验结果。此外,还讨论了观测趋势的物理解释。最后,提出了土坯抗压强度动态增长系数的新计算公式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信