A comparative study of block matching and optical flow motion estimation algorithms

J. Philip, Binoshi Samuvel, K. Pradeesh, N. K. Nimmi
{"title":"A comparative study of block matching and optical flow motion estimation algorithms","authors":"J. Philip, Binoshi Samuvel, K. Pradeesh, N. K. Nimmi","doi":"10.1109/AICERA.2014.6908204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Block matching and optical flow algorithms are the two major motion estimation techniques that are widely employed today. The main aim of this paper is to compare the above two algorithms in terms of processing time, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity (SSIM) and Mean Opinion Score (MOS). An exhaustive search block matching algorithm which has the maximum efficiency compared to any other block matching algorithm as well as the Brox's optical flow estimation algorithm are implemented. The algorithms are optimized by selecting appropriate parameter values that gives the best result. Then the algorithms are compared based on their motion estimated image for the same input image sequence and finally the results obtained are analyzed.","PeriodicalId":425226,"journal":{"name":"2014 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: Magnetics, Machines and Drives (AICERA/iCMMD)","volume":"416 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: Magnetics, Machines and Drives (AICERA/iCMMD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICERA.2014.6908204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Block matching and optical flow algorithms are the two major motion estimation techniques that are widely employed today. The main aim of this paper is to compare the above two algorithms in terms of processing time, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity (SSIM) and Mean Opinion Score (MOS). An exhaustive search block matching algorithm which has the maximum efficiency compared to any other block matching algorithm as well as the Brox's optical flow estimation algorithm are implemented. The algorithms are optimized by selecting appropriate parameter values that gives the best result. Then the algorithms are compared based on their motion estimated image for the same input image sequence and finally the results obtained are analyzed.
块匹配与光流运动估计算法的比较研究
块匹配和光流算法是目前应用最广泛的两种运动估计技术。本文的主要目的是比较上述两种算法在处理时间、峰值信噪比(PSNR)、结构相似度(SSIM)和平均意见评分(MOS)方面的差异。实现了一种与其他块匹配算法相比效率最高的穷举搜索块匹配算法以及Brox光流估计算法。通过选择适当的参数值来优化算法,从而获得最佳结果。然后在相同输入图像序列下,基于运动估计图像对两种算法进行比较,最后对所得结果进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信